If you eliminate the possibility of political action then the civic society and the market are the only means of achieving one’s ends. – Markets in everything.
Natural law: nonparasitic cooperation requires productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer limited externalities of the same criteria.
I think the descriptive model is that of king as first among equals, and nobles as franchisees. We didn’t really invent the partnership and corporation. We were practicing them for all of our history.
We have been capitalists for long enough that we have inverted the conceptual problem of interpreting the past: the only marginal difference in the value of the corporation was the quality and volume of the land held for mining, farming, grazing.
Why is it necessary for governments to legislate norms? Why do governments have the epistemic, moral, or practical justification (and this is where justification matters) for the legislation of norms? If we cooperate by natural law (non-imposition) then the civic society is the logical outcome – unless there is social devolution because of heterogeneity. Why should I appeal to the provision of commons (government) for that which is a natural law (court)?
but if such things are the deterministic consequence of natural law, why must the government legislate them? In other words, under a constitution of non-imposition, is not the civic society a deterministic outcome?
SO when colonizing an area we must put in place a constitution of natural law. Now lets return to the question: if we have judges of natural law in that new territory, is legislation necessary, or are judges of natural law sufficient?
Every man fights. No Man Quits. We must suppress parasitism and never again let down our guardianship of morality and liberty. ?#?NewRight?
A man who does not fight for liberty and morality is a coward and a thief – and has not earned liberty or morality by his actions. ?#?NewRight?
Ergo you have no virtue whatsoever if you fail to use violence to suppress parasitism in interpersonal(moral) and political form. ?#?NewRight?
So the way to restore the west is the organized application of violence to suppress the natural parasitism of women and parasitic classes.
Political Liberty and Personal Morality require the organized use of personal violence to suppress parasitism political and interpersonal.
So it is not that I have some passion for violence, but a passion to prosecute those who fail to construct liberty while claiming virtues.
We lost our civilization by trying to signal to women and avoid the high cost of using violence to impose morality and liberty. ?#?NewRight?
Women immediately sought about allying with the lower classes to destroy property rights and the high cost of preserving them.?#?NewRight?
The purpose of political rights is to select the commons we produce with the scarce proceeds from production and reproduction.?#?NewRight?
One need no political rights if one possesses property rights – unless one seeks to violate property rights. ?#?NewRight?
Granting women political equality was impossible – they cannot pay the cost of violence necessary for the construction of morality.?#?NewRight?
Those who eschew violence seek only to escape the high cost of creating a condition of personal morality and political liberty. ?#?NewRight?
Why? Because violence = intrinsically neutral value. If put to moral ends a virtue and to immoral ends a crime. Might Can Make ?#?NewRight?
—Nietzsche holds that moral values are not conducive to the flourishing of human excellence,— You mean, ‘moral norms’ not moral laws. As a german he is both a conflator and a prisoner of conflation of others. Non-operationalism bites him too. All moral laws are negative. I am having a hard time understanding what inspiration to greatness (aesthetics) and morals have to do with one another. (Nothing)
—“Every choice human being,” says Nietzsche, “strives instinctively for a citadel and a secrecy where he is saved from the crowd, the many, the great majority…”— I want to be insulated from the political folly of the crowd. On the other hand I love the moral classes regardless of wealth or sophistication, and despise the immoral classes regardless of wealth or sophistication.
Why? I am trying to end the false virtue signaling of the pacifists, and restore responsibility for the preservation of commons. ?#?NewRight?
The Middle Class Thinkers could not solve social science. Why? It would have been an admission their enlightenment was a failure. ?#?NewRight?
Sorry. I’m not a Racist. I know you’d like it if I was. But Truth is a universal. I do truth. Social Science. Solutions. For all mankind.
Fantasizing about desirable end points demonstrates one’s ignorance. Knowledge consists of knowing existentially possible operations, and how to arrange those operations to produce the desired outcome.
SOCIAL SCIENCE: Natural Law, Monarchy, Regional Nobility, Market Commons, Family, Nationalism.
When I use the term Monarchy, I use it in the narrow sense as a property holder of territory and formal institutions, where the monarch provides the ultimate veto power over contracts for commons, and the judiciary ultimate veto power over natural law.
(I just realized that for all of school and university I only liked the social circumstance – it was a calm safe social place – but I generally ignored the teachers and professors and just read the books, and couldn’t’ care less about the tests. There are only two professors I felt I learned anything from (rhetoric, and political science). The rest were just discussion leaders. I learned everything from books and almost nothing from people. )
I have understood the german secret. the secret anglos lost. the oath. that is all it is. nothing more. the oath alone produces the culture.
Almost all wealth today consists of promises (obligations) that are only remittable (payable) if the economic velocity continues unabated. Most paper wealth only exists then as momentum. End the momentum, and end the wealth. End the wealth, end the influence.
There is no equality among men; only better or worse in this way or that. There is no rest or respite for us. Rule is costly. But one must rule or be ruled.
The church only cares for itself. It has no truck with Europa. It never did. We were but excuse. Labor for the fields. Coin for the tithe. Fools for the book of lies. Rule or be ruled.
Having failed at the colonial program because of its civil war,the west is now colonized by the barbarians it would have civilized.?#?NewRight?
The longer I work on the necessity of a judicial priesthood, the longer I study the Templars(bankers), the Inquisition(judges), the closer I come to the model I’m looking for. The problem is always paying for the initial stages. The first phase must produce sufficient confiscation that the men can be fed and armed. Yet wholesale predation on the islamic model (ISIS) is counter-productive.
Living in isolated cubes, watching fake friends, belonging to fake families, obtaining status from consumer goods. The mirror lies. SERF.
Man I do NOT wanna be roped into populism but it’s like a force of gravity.
FROM THE ART OF DUELING: “The practice is severely censured by all religious and thinking people; yet it has very justly been remarked, that ‘the great gentleness and complacency of modern manners, and those respectful attentions of one man to another, that at present render the social discourses of life far more agreeable and decent, than among the most civilized nations of antiquity; must be ascribed, in some degree to this absurd custom.’ It is certainly both awful and distressing to see a young person cut off suddenly in a duel, particularly if he be the father of a family; but the loss of a few lives is a mere trifle, when compared with the benefits resulting to Society at large.
I should consider it very unwise in the members of government, to adopt any measures that would enforce the prohibition of duelling…the man who falls in a duel, and the individual who is killed by the overturn of a stage-coach, are both unfortunate victims to a practice from which we derive great advantage. It would be absurd to prohibit stage-travelling-because, occasionally, a few lives are lost by an overturn.”
So they Reporter asks me “What do you have to say to our politicians about corruption?” And, I said something along the lines of “nothing. All politicians are corrupt.” Then “The reason they get away with corruption is the person in the mirror: you let them.” Then ” So, I have something to say to Ukrainian mothers: raise your sons to fight for liberty, or you shall never have liberty.”
The longbow were decisive in something like four major battles. After that the french learned that the cavalry must break the archer’s lines before they can set up a defensive position. It looks like the bend (pull) of a long bow varied from 80/100lbs to 160/180lbs. Skeletons of archers show the stress. The upper body strength of these men must have been freaking amazing. And men had to be raised to use them. They could not just equip men with the technology. Conversely, we can teach almost anyone competency with a rifle in a few sessions.
The duel was outlawed only because we allowed champions (substitutes). This led to the evolution of a series of hired murderers. It was this reason that the duel did not survive.
If you speak the truth, you can construct an argument, not complaint, sarcasam, ridicule. If not, then you do not speak the truth. ?#?NewRight?
The Torah, The Bible and the Koran are the greatest acts of fraud in human history. Why do we tolerate fraud in the commons? ?#?NewRight?
( The more radical I allow myself to become, the more satisfied I become as a westerner, as a man, as a human being. I suspect this will be a universal feeling for all western men – those who are still men that is. ) ?#?NewRight?
I am pretty confident that Russians think they are doing good just like Americans. Both are idiots. Mind your own fucking business and severely punish the wicked.
You need to take it personally. There is a very great chance we are going to bring about a civil war this year. Own it. ?#?NewRight?
I want to make Vlad the Impaler look like a candy striper.
British: desperately seeking congratulations. Americans: desperately seeking attention. Canadians desperately seeking mediocrity.
Diplomacy is the art of saying nice doggie while looking for a rock. Strategy is having a rock in hand.
Aspies have trouble learning to converse in large part because it is very hard to figure how to lie constantly like everyone else.
Luke Lynch: I wonder if Wittgenstein’s attempt to understand his own autism may have influenced his philosophical preoccupations.
If your concept of god is “him who created the rules of the universe”, then if Physical law, Natural Law, Common Law, Norms, Traditions, Myths and Rituals are identical, then man has followed the commands of god and become one with god’s deigns.
And only evil does otherwise. Any religion incompatible with physical and natural law is not divine: it is either error or the work of the devil.
Just as I’m a good Anglo boy, and Hoppe is a good German boy, Rothbard was a good Jewish boy who intuited that separatism (the ethics between nations) could be universalized as an ethic between individuals.
All groups make this mistake. Westerners (wrongly) intuit universal inclusion. Jews (wrongly) interpret universal separatism. These are not universals but group evolutionary strategies that facilitate group survival amidst competition.
I believe I know more about Anarchism than any man other than perhaps Hoppe. But that’s like saying I also know a great deal about lying and deception. I would not advocate lying and deception, and I would not advocate anarchism.
I’d advocate truth and nomocracy.
Truth is enough.
My (Amazing) ex-wife and I used to go on lots of walks and talk about all sorts of things. Men love to walk and talk. But the subject of the talking matters a great deal.
I can go to prison as a CEO for the actions of my subordinates, but a politician cannot?
There is no better way to be remembered in history as freeing your people by violence from invasion made possible by weak leaders.
WE ALL FAILED
Anglo, American, French, German, Jewish
We all tried to position our group evolutionary strategy, as a universal moral code, each of us using our internal method of social argument: empirical, legal, moral, rational, pseudoscientific.
WE ALL FAILED
Truth is enough.
FRANK: I can’t argue with that! The hard part, however, is knowing when you have some universal truth (and the solution lies in discovering when what you have is NOT true).
I use the term ‘Limits’ because I am fairly sure that it is erroneous to call what works false when it is the justification not the recipe that seems to incrementally expand.
FRANK: I think I understand what you mean to mean, and if I am right in my understanding, I agree! Still, sometimes what works satisfyingly for a time is subsequently found replaceable by something that works even better — for example, the discovery that Newtonian mechanics is a special case of relativistic mechanics that holds exactly only in the limit of v approaching zero, but is “good enough” an approximation for most government work when v is << c).
Moral language is a failure because they convinced useful idiots that morality was subjective. Financial and economic language defeats them.
Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Keynes, Rothbard, Strauss. The old right failed to crush pseudoscience. Truth crushes pseudoscience. TRUTH
Is it that Germans have no pseudoscience because they have rationalism and German philosophical literature instead? What can I learn from that? Is the ineffectiveness of Anglo literature because of science and law? Why?
Why are we the ?#?NewRight?? Because we earned it. The West rose because we invented Testimony. We tell the truth. The Old Right didn’t.
If I write a thorough analysis people complain. If I write pithily people both complain and misunderstand. No happy medium exists. smile emoticon
If you want a solid argument you must supply a chain.
if you want to inform you create an image.
the chain is hard to understand, but once understood, correct.
the image is easy to understand a little, but misunderstand a lot.
It’s problem of costs
The moral high ground: If you cannot accept voluntary exchange with us in the production of commons we cannot tolerate your existence.
The problem with western civilization is easily found – in the mirror. Civilizations do what warriors allow them to do. And nothing more.
The strong plan and act. The weak gossip and complain.
Bitching about the present, criticizing the past, is not the same as providing a solution. Creating a plan. Acting on it. (Ignorance whines)