Curt Doolittle updated his status.

(FB 1552010801 Timestamp)


—“Curt: What would (….) in a propertarian society?”—

Propertarianism is a methodology, consisting of a set of methodologies, a set of definitions, and a set of arguments, that produce a commensurable language, complete the scientific method, and embody that scientific method into rule of law.

What you do with that law is wide open – it just has to be transparent, and it will prohibit all sorts of lying in public about whatever order you have.

P-law is extremely facist out of the box – it is extremely nationalistic, and extremely intolerant, and especially intolerant of our ancient enemy’s means of deceit. And It is very hard to engage in malfeasance under P-Law since it is simply too profitable for individuals to report criminals for fun and profit. It is a ruthless system of government for enemies of the productive people. It has no mercy for enemies foreign or domestic.

My focus has been on correcting the United states first, and the other european states second.

I recommend, for my people, and my people alone, because my people alone appear capable of it:

0 – An independent judiciary of the natural law
1 – A militia of all able bodied men in the regimental model, attached to a ‘church’/’school’. A standing army of professional warriors, and citizen employees of the military who are inducted in emergencies, since an increasing scope of military work is technical and administrative.
2 – A Hereditary Monarchy with a professional cabinet
3 – Virtual Houses of Governors, Industry, Business, Labor, and Family(homeowners). Where house members are selected randomly from the population, to provide assent or dissent to proposals by the monarchy in the raising and use of taxes. And where all houses must ‘pass’ (ascend).
4 – A near prohibition on bureaucracy; all government service “at the pleasure of the monarchy”; and a prohibition on pensions for public servants.
5 – My understanding is that this would provide all the benefits of fascism without the need for a dictator-character and the attendant risk. Even then, there is no reason a monarch cannot appoint such a person as did the romans, in times of crisis or need.

This produces a very different set of incentives since everyone is always and everywhere accountable for everything.

Monarchies appear to run better governments until they cannot. They cannot when the commercial complexity reaches the point of choosing limited investments from a host of possible investments. In this case the middle class appears to do well UNTIL they start socializing losses and privatizing the commons or engaging in arbitrage against the long term interests of the people.

Any number of these monarchies can be federated under a supreme court of the natural law, just as the church federated the monarchies under church ‘license’ – the principle value of the court and the church being the ‘delegitimization’ of a ruler or a government, there by sanctioning the people and neighbors to replace that ruler, in the european tradition. This would, I expect, be rare, since royal families are extremely intolerant of family members who risk their status – and often make them ‘disappear’.

My preference (Fantasy) would be to restore the anglo empire, and the germanic (Holy roman) empire, and to complete the intermarium and end the conflict of the 20th century brought about by ((())) the enemies of our people under the banner of world communism and the destruction of our peoples.

For other peoples I recommend a flexible system of government not terribly different from the Roman and English:

  • Fascism (Generalship) for time of war or conflict.
  • Monarchies with professional cabinets as long as possible
  • Adding Houses of government as via negativa juries when too large. These juries must only approve/deny raising of funds by the monarchy (cabinet).
  • If for some reason some semblance of democracy is necessary (it isn’t, but it may be impossible to avoid it for pragmatic reasons) I recommend virtual houses for each of the classes and genders, where classes trade in a market rather than pass legislation by majority rule. Where resources are either equally or proportionally distributed. Then posting proposals for x months, then using a lottery (Greece) rather than politicians to select the juries (houses), then allowing the juries to conduct business (trade)

In other words, there is no ‘propertarian society’ per se other than all those societies run under rule of law by natural law.

You can ask me questions of natural law – ‘what would the law say about ????’
You can ask me about different political orders: “what order, or what would you recommend for ????”
You can ask me what constitution I’d recommend for america or germany, or england or poland etc. “what would you recommend for????”
You can ask me what I’ve put in the working constitution.

As long as they are under natural law they are ‘propertarian’.

If they are not then they are not.

Leave a Reply