Author: Curt Doolittle (ericd)

Q: The logic of first principles is your culture? 🙂(tongue in cheek question) (western civ) Western civilization in a nutshell: 😉 And as you’ve noticed the desire for sovereignty and responsibility is limited in the human distribution with some of us preferring authority and subservience in lieu of responsibility despite that it deprives them of […]

THE NATURAL LAW OF DECIDABILTY ON THE STATE OF PHYSICS:1) Yes there is a classical explanation of quantum mechanics using fluid dynamics.2) Yes an ‘aether’ exists as the quantum background with fluidic properties.3) The variables aren’t hidden. They were deducible. They weren’t deduced because of a failure permute upon classical explanations in favor of continuing […]

THE MONARCHY IS AS IMPORTANT AS RULE OF LAWYes, I am an absolutely devoted monarchist. Not only because of my heritage, but because I have a deep understanding that the monarchy is as important an institution – especially in it’s english form – necessary for the preservation of our civilization and our natural, common, concurrent […]

Everyone wants to define The Work by what they find important in it. What’s important in the work is universal commensurable, value netural, decidability. The rest is application of that decidability to the scope of human knowledge and experience. The most present and urgent application is the resolution of the conflict stared by the second […]

THE SIMPLE LOGIC OF THE SCIENCE OF ALL HUMAN BEHAVIOR Curt DoolittleThe Natural Law InstituteThe Science of Cooperation

Q: “CURT, DO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD?” I choose to believe in god. I talk to god all the time. I do not adhere to any given concept of god. I do not claim to understand anything about that god or make any claims about god. I do not need to. If you have faith […]

–“Pretty much everyone in the Institute publicly speaks for himself rather than the Institute. And, it’s probably better for Curt’s image as, interestingly, he’s the least hard-right member, lol.”– Martin Stepan Yes. Because the institute produces a via negative logic of the natural law of decidability. That tells us what’s untestifiable, false, and reciprocal. It […]

YOU CAN’T WIN HEARTS AND MINDS OF THE LEFT We can’t win hearts and minds when our group strategy is sovereignty, liberty, freedom, and opportunity by taking responsibility for the private and common – and the enemy is giving out promises of irresponsibility and dependency and freedom from market competition, from their status, from their […]

TERMINOLOGYThere no conflict between the sets of terms we use in different contexts, whether the long form for ordinary language or the formal short form we take from the logic of computation for the sake of brevity. We can use both for The Natural Law Project. We also use the following terms to address the […]

THE ERADICATION OF THE LEFT – FOR ALL TIME Our goal is the total eradication of the left, or rather, the means by which the left lies and deceives, undermines, and engages in sedition and treason, by the institutional criminalization of their methods, and the use of the courts to treat all such sedition as […]

–“Q: Curt, what is the best way I can study your work? Is there… for lack of a better term, a lesson plan?”– Most of the time, I tell people just to follow us because it’s a huge scope of work and gradual introduction is more effective than cramming. That said we recognize people want […]

REMINDER FOR ALL: INSTITUTE DECORUM (we’ve added new people to the team) We develop and teach the natural law of decidability, testimony, reciprocity, and cooperation for the purpose of ending the current crisis made possible by industrial, technological, and medical modernity, the wealth that has resulted, in our decreased interdependence, increased alienation because of it, […]

TRUTH. (NOTE: Do we have to redo this or is it already in ROI article?) It’s taken over 2500 years to solve the question of truth, and doing so required disambiguating it into it’s constituent parts: Decidability is a criterion used to evaluate whether a statement can be tested and resolved as true or false, […]

Someone recently said, “Assertions about the importance of HBD [human biodiversity] are rife on the internet among high-IQ bloggers.” We thus created the following bibliography to aid those interested in human biodiversity. The bibliography is eclectic and a work in progress. Its creators do not necessarily agree with all the ideas presented in the following […]

ONE IS THERE A SOLUTION TO GETTTING ALONG I have worked on this problem for more years and in more detail than anyone living (or dead for that matter.) And it’s common knowledge that my work may require multiple reads and considerable knowledge of the spectrum of disciplines. And it’s common knowledge that like darwin […]

(Thoughts)Our team works in via negativa constructive logic. But we use common terms to avoid neologisms. So for example, when we say ‘moral’ we mean ‘not immoral’, and we define immoral as irreciprocal, meaning empirically determined,by universally demonstrated retaliation. So while individual, normative, and group variation in moral rules varies by context, this is due […]

by ContraFabian @ContraFabianist The minimum conditions for positive reciprocity are particular to an exchange (via positiva, scale dependent), whereas, the minimum conditions for negative reciprocity are universal (via negativa, scale independent). Universal aversion to the imposition of costs on demonstrated interests (negative reciprocity) does not assume a particular portfolio of interests—property—but accounts for variation in […]

Since he wrote enough content I can respond. 7 big presuppositions of science that science itself can’t validate: 1. The senses are reliable 2. The mind is rational 3. The universe is rational 4. The uniformity of nature to justify induction 5. The laws of logic 6 The existence of numbers 7. The existence of […]

NONSENSE: Not a historian but an idealogue: Democracy wasn’t and isn’t the goal it’s a means. Liberty by Sovereignty was and is the goal. Prohibition on authority the means of achieving it. Rule of Law of self-determination by sovereignty in demonstrated interests (merit) and reciprocity in display word and deed (morality) the means of testing […]

-“And you presume to know anything about argumentation? You have a lot of learning to do, including in the areas you think you know.”- (a) conflates formal argument (proofs) with informal (debate) (b) conflates persuade with testify (c) conflates neutrality with criminality. So what you fail to understand is that in western philosophical tradition, we […]

Cofnas is intellectually embarrassing for the vapid criticism that denies that group strategies exist — when I can identify group strategies just by linguistic analysis, just as we can identify sex, class, ethnicity from it. Nietzche was wrong. Jews are a feminine race, but(a) much much higher aggression. Aggression decreased with the four racial speciation […]

? @badofi  The anglosphere doesn’t want to function as globalists. Americans in particular are insular, and only created the global order to defeat the communists in both RU and CN from spreading to the ME. The Anglosphere’s problem is that it needs air-sea control for safety the way Eurasia needs land safety. Ergo, a land-based rail […]

“Othering” is necessary for preservation of aggressive separatism, nepotism, and concentration of capital in the group. Why have we not seen the same behavior among diasporic Germans, Chinese, Armenians, Huguenots, Hungarians, Greeks, etc?”–Harold Fairhair @fairhair_harold Have or haven’t we? Compare occupational differences of diasporas. What you’ll observe is the most important insight into cultural differences […]

1. Avg IQ in Islam 84, avg IQ in Christendom 100 – one full standard deviation. 2. Low trust civilization favoring facelessness (vs truth), familism, clannism, tribalism over nationalism, and where cheating and corruption are heroic and expected. 3. Islam’s mandate of ignorance. 2. But because it’s a religion for populations with low average IQs […]

Steve is always right, but I want to propose an additional sequence through which to view the history of economics: the problems each generation was trying to solve as we passed through the sequential revolutions in sail, agrarian production, commerce, finance, industrial, and technological: So Economic Schools = Social Science and rule of law, vs […]