THAT’S A MISTAKE.
You’re attributing a skill to a similarity. In other words, very smart people understand each other just as well as ordinary people understand each other just as well as very stupid people understand each other. But just as you can’t understand very smart people, they can’t necessarily understand you. There are a lot more average people (66%) than there are exceptional people (the under 1%). This makes average people think they have a skill, rather than, that they are just surrounded by many people more like them.
So emotions and others play a larger role in the life of ordinary people than they do very smart people. And it is harder to imagine why someone would rely on the opinion and intuitions of others when “they are so often wrong or foolish”.
WHY?
At 7 points (1/2 standard deviation) one can provide help to one another. At 15 points (1 standard deviation) the higher can provide management and leadership to the lower, but at 22 points (1–1/2 standard deviation) we have difficulting understanding each other, and at 30 points (2 standard deviations), we have a great difficulty understanding one another.
We are just as different as types of ants. The difference is that our differences are cognitive and emotional not physical.
EXAMPLE
I had a very hard time understanding why ‘normies’ worried or had fears or concerns about trivial things, and how important trust of others was, and how much of their information and decisions they obtained from others rather than their own investigation, and moreover, what they found entertaining and interesting. I thought people were just plain mean and evil until I understood how … limited they were … and that they were just doing the best that they could. Once I understood it I was horrified, and depressed for months. )
One response to “—“Why do geniuses have a low EQ?”—”
In any population somewhere in the region of 60 to 80% of all people will look to other people for guidance. Irrespective of absolute IQ.
About 1 in 6 people will be smarter than the average person. Hence it makes sense for the average person to look to others for guidance. Especially successful others.
I believe this is well known in advertising.
Also: as people climb the social hierarchy they tend to become less susceptible to the opinion of others (it is said they become more asocial). I.e. nature has found a way to diminish the search for guidance for the higher IQ people.
This effect will pay off in times of scarcity but in times of surplus -when the upperclass will likely consist of psychopaths- this effect may be ‘less than optimal’.