Re: “~curt’s not addressing the mathematical argument”
I addressed it. You just didn’t understand it. It’s really simple: in the human line, vox used Change (Mutation) rate vs Survival (Fixation) Rate. I’m not sure why I need to do your work for you instead of simply pointing out the rather obviuos error of using the wrong variable. Of course vox is wrong. He’s made an amateur’s error.
And to cut the rest of you off at the knees, I’ve been expanding the ‘error’ (motivated reasoning: in other words, a lie by failure of due diligence) to explain the variables and mathematical constraints on evolutionary processes themselves.
This is beyond you but then, what I”m illustrating is that the concepts are beyond the entire vox-moron clique – because – by natural selection – anyone stupid (evolutionarily unfit) enough to fall for vox’s ‘pseudomath’ and moron-service argument, would of course, follow someone who supplied justification for motivated reasoning for like minded morons.
Note how no one has even once, demonstrated even the vaguest understanding of mathematics, genetics, or logic.
Which is expected really.
Which is the whole point of this little side project.