Q: “Why do you keep using the term P-Law?”


WHY I KEEP USING THE TERM “P-LAW”
(P-Method, P-Logic, P-Science, P-Law, etc.)

“P-Complete” from Wikipedia:
“In computational complexity theory, a decision problem is P-complete (complete for the complexity class P) if it is in P and every problem in P can be reduced to it by an appropriate reduction.” Ergo: **All existence can be explained by reduction to the first principles of evolutionary computation. In other words, anything that can exist can be reduced to a formal description in P-Law.** I abandoned the term ‘Propertarianism’ since it applied only to the original system of measurement in ethics and morality. I kept the “P-” for P-Completeness. And because ‘-ism’ implies a philosophy, and P-Law is a formal logic: a science that unifies the logics and sciences.

Ergo P-Law is P-Complete.


Leave a Reply