THE MONARCHY IS AS IMPORTANT AS RULE OF LAW
Yes, I am an absolutely devoted monarchist. Not only because of my heritage, but because I have a deep understanding that the monarchy is as important an institution – especially in it’s english form – necessary for the preservation of our civilization and our natural, common, concurrent law, our constitution of that law, the protection of the people by the trifunctional competition between elites forced by that law, the natural aristocracy that evolves from that competition, and the benefits that we derive from all the above, by preserving the military tradition of duty before self, in which all of us are due respect regardless of rank for bearing the responsibility of our rank, to the best of our abilities.
The monarchy is our judge of last resort, our last court of appeal for the redress of greivances against the court, the government, the elites, the academic, the financial, industrial, commercial, social bad actors, and the mass of the common people as well.
The purpose of the modern british monarchy is not so much to rule, but to retain all rights above and outside the law in the restoration of the natural, common, concurrent, law of trifuctional civilization, and the prosperity and posterity of the people as a consequence.
The envious, that seek to evade responsibility, will always engage in sedition against those that accept responsibility and obtain status and respect for doing so from otherse who equally accept responsibility. Because there are and always will be and always have been those who are unwilling unable and unhappy with responsibility to the commons over their self satisfaction. Particularly when it means we sort into a status hierarchy by the responsibility we take and hold for the commons.
The optimum system is rule of law by the natural, common, concurrent, trifuctional law of cooperation, a judiciary for the resolution of differences by that law, a monarchy as judge of last resort, a cabinet for the enactment of policy, a parliament(jury) consisting of houses of the classes (scale of responsibilities, meaning scope of knowledge and understanding), each with a presiding judge (minister) of procedure, and the participation of the people who demonstrate responsibility for the commons as a jury to assent or dissent from the parliaments.
So, Yes, I am an absolutely devoted monarchist – and you should be too.
Cheers
