–“…there won’t be a state v state “civil war..”– @VDAREJamesK
When the predictions of a future US civil war in response to demographic shifts occurred in the 90s, everyone, but especially Lind was clear that it would be a house-to-house war which would be more equivalent to recent middle easter civil wars, with the government, and in particular the military, too small to be effective at anything at all.
And where the tactics that the ‘rebels’ on both sides would rely on would evolve to baiting first responders into traps and thus causing the local, state, and federal agencies of enforcement to withdraw to safety.
Second is that we think in terms of weapons, but fire is the most effective weapon that is the cheapest to produce and the most effective force multiplier. (In Maydan I was surprised as I stood there and watched the production of molotov cocktails how few men and women – and how few ‘adventurous’ young men in particular – were required to push back the various policing organizations.
And maydan was a only a demonstration.
I have done one revolution already, and while I’ve promised the FBI I won’t advocate for one, or inspire anyone to do so, that doesn’t mean it’s wise to point out that a civil war today is a house to house affair widely distributed, that would rapidly escalate, and that state and federal governments could not stop.
As such we should (as my organization does) do everything possible to end the postwar undermining, sedition, and treason against our civilization from within before a civil war is the only means of resolving it.
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute
The Science of Cooperation
8:57 PM · Dec 28, 2023
·
8,917
Views
