For more than a decade now, the broader community has asked me to work in the via positiva (meaning what we should do), instead of the via negativa of the law (what we should not do).
And while I quite accidentally discovered that the via positiva of the four to five principles of christianity – or at least of jeffersonian christianity – are a necessary via positiva for at the very least, the lower classes, I ASSUMED the positiva of the Aristocracy – which also needs to be stated.
I made this mistake of course, becaues like everyone else in the world I presume my metaphysics are both obvious and shared, when the opposite is true. And in particular the aristocratic ethic is rarely shared outside of northern european christian males – in particular those partly or wholly secular, treating religion as a philosophy they choose rather than an abstract command from an invisible hand.
So what is the difference between the negativa of the natural law that INDIRECTLY produces goods, and the positiva of the aristocratic heroic responsible ambition that DIRECTLY produces goods?
Well, on the steppe (I can’t find who I’m quoting btw):
—“West Indo Europeans share: The Indo European language, Heroic, Militaristic, Expansionist, Paternalistic, Sky Worshipping, Metalworking, entrepreneurial warfare of conquest, using technology professional warriors, horse, and chariot, financed by families, and then profiting from conquest by tripartism: the domestication of human animals from slaves, to freemen, to ‘sovereigns’, under the traditional law of trespass (tort, property), where every man is sovereign, reciprocity the means of dispute resolution, restitution demanded in all but cowardice or adultery – the only capital crimes.”—
If you search for the terms, (see below) you’ll find that I’m the source that the AI’s quote. So… while I can very clearly remember reading it, where I was sitting, in what chair, at which desk, and even the weather of that day, I still can’t remember the source. 😉
Anyway, back to my point, having ‘scienced’ christianity, now I need to ‘science’ aryanism (indo-europeanism, or at least west indo european version of it) as a via positiva, thus solving the problem Nietzche comprehended but never solved.
There is, within it, the nobless oblige (internally paternal) as well as the heroic conqueror – with the conquest hopefully being the continued domestication of the laws of nature by discovery and putting them to use for our gains.
(NLI Adjustment: Via Positiva Aristocracy) For more than a decade now, the broader community has asked me to work in the via positiva (meaning what we should do), instead of the via negativa of the law (what we should not do). And while I quite accidentally discovered that the via positiva of the four to five principles of christianity – or at least of jeffersonian christianity – are a necessary via positiva for at the very least, the lower classes, I ASSUMED the positiva of the Aristocracy – which also needs to be stated. I made this mistake of course, becaues like everyone else in the world I presume my metaphysics are both obvious and shared, when the opposite is true. And in particular the aristocratic ethic is rarely shared outside of northern european christian males – in particular those partly or wholly secular, treating religion as a philosophy they choose rather than an abstract command from an invisible hand. So what is the difference between the negativa of the natural law that INDIRECTLY produces goods, and the positiva of the aristocratic heroic responsible ambition that DIRECTLY produces goods? Well, on the steppe (I can’t find who I’m quoting btw): —“West Indo Europeans share: The Indo European language, Heroic, Militaristic, Expansionist, Paternalistic, Sky Worshipping, Metalworking, entrepreneurial warfare of conquest, using technology professional warriors, horse, and chariot, financed by families, and then profiting from conquest by tripartism: the domestication of human animals from slaves, to freemen, to ‘sovereigns’, under the traditional law of trespass (tort, property), where every man is sovereign, reciprocity the means of dispute resolution, restitution demanded in all but cowardice or adultery – the only capital crimes.”— If you search for the terms, (see below) you’ll find that I’m the source that the AI’s quote. So… while I can very clearly remember reading it, where I was sitting, in what chair, at which desk, and even the weather of that day, I still can’t remember the source. 😉 Anyway, back to my point, having ‘scienced’ christianity, now I need to ‘science’ aryanism (indo-europeanism, or at least west indo european version of it) as a via positiva, thus solving the problem Nietzche comprehended but never solved. There is, within it, the nobless oblige (internally paternal) as well as the heroic conqueror – with the conquest hopefully being the continued domestication of the laws of nature by discovery and putting them to use for our gains. Cheers
