THE FALL OF LIBERTARIANS INTO SILLY PEOPLE
Re: “…Hoppe’s axiomatic “Ethics of Argumentation”…”
Common failure of false premises.
Claims verbal argument pursuit of truth under pre-established consent to reciprocity, instead of verbal negotiation under presumption of possibility of violence.
In other words, Hoppe’s argument, a derivation of marxist argument by hoppe’s mentor, Habermas, and like most of rothbardian libertarianism is circular because it assumes its conclusion in its false premise. Once you recognize that all rothbardian ethics are circular by this same method you will grasp that you too. have been suckered by the feminine > jewish > abrahamic > marxist sequence of seduction into false promise by baiting into hazard via positiva, and sedition by undermining using critique via negativa.
I don’t err. There is a reason I left MI and PFS behind as failed programs when you were still a child. And there is a reason the Rothbardians are afraid of me. It’s because I am correct. Rothbardianism is a sophistry of middle class marxism – a means of evading European natural law of reciprocity, and the demand for capialization of the commons that disambiguates diasporic separatist and middle eastern low trust ethics, from territorial federated European high trust ethics.
That you don’t know this is just your lack of experience in the field. And don’t feel bad. This technique of deception is as sophisticated as the european techniques of truth discovery. In fact that is why the feminine -to – abrahamic – to.- marxist sequence was originatelly invented: as resistance against greek reason and the superiority of the indo europeans whether persian or greco-roman.
When Libertarians were Anglo Classical Liberals they were the thought leadership of conservatism. When Libertarians were captured by the Rothbarians they lost not only their leadership, but their intellectual legitimacy, and became a cult of cranks, half right in their understanding of economics, but wrong human nature, and especially in their vulnerability to sophistry.
I love Hoppe despite his false premises, his conclusions were brilliant. I found value in Mises’ despite his ideas were a synthesis of others’ and his failure to grasp the meaning of the term logic. I found what was wrong in the jewish pseudoscience stack as well as libertarianism in Rothbard.
And by 2010, libertarianism died along with Ron Paul’s campaign, the 2008 crash, and the Obama conversion of the federal government to his anti-white anti-colonialist woke mission, which rapidly spread through the academy and education now that thy had tacit permission. The availability of social media assisted in this mass production of sophistry and pseudoscience … and here we are.
We have anti-intellectual conservatives whether christian or traditionalist, we have anti-classical liberalism in the fascists, and we have infantile naivety in the Rothbardian libertarians. And the few of us who remain classical liberals attempt to carry the intellectual burden of the west despite all the odds being against us.
