Category: Thoughts

  • Demarcation Between Truth(decidability) and Choice (preference) Is Complete.

    I think the demarcation between truth(decidability) and choice (preference) is complete. Philosophy only tells us choice now, while law (reciprocity), science(consistency correspondence, and coherence), and mathematics(measurement) provide decidability regardless of choice. The top of the pyramid is not philosophy but testimony, law, science, mathematics, and the logic faculty in a consistent coherent ontology. While philosophy…

  • Testimony Is the Basis of Our Civilization

      —“Testimony … that’s pretty cool as a basis for civilization. Never would have thought of it that way.”—Michael Churchill

  • Findings of the Law

    99% of law is not in fact ‘law’ but findings and application of the law. And because these findings and applications of law have no means of expiry they don’t vaporize. The law can’t change. There is only one: reciprocity. A constitution’s articles provide organizations and processes for administering that law. A constitutional Amendments include…

  • Supernatural, Moral, Rational, Scientific

      —“Unite the right by natural law. We don’t have to agree on where the law comes from, just on what it is.”—Martin Št?pán The result is the same, only the why differs.

  • . . .

    “Simply: if right and left is eugenic and dysgenic, respectively; it’s not right and left; it’s right and wrong.”

  • Reciprocity, Testimony, Dimensions

    Again. Dimensions. Logic = Constant relations of sense perceptions. Identity =(NAMES) – Internally consistent, not inconsistent, sets of properties – Constant Relations between collections of properties. Sets = (LANGUAGE) – Internally consistent (constant, consistent relations), Relations, , .) – Constant relations between collections of references Science = (OBSERVATIONS) – Empirical, externally correspondent, correlative – Constant…

  • Updating Arthur C Clarke

      *Any sufficiently intelligent individual will be indistinguishable from an artificial intelligence.

  • Value Judgements Are Opinions

    VALUE JUDGEMENTS ARE OPINIONS To a large extent terms like good and evil or ethical and unethical are opinions. The catch is that if morality and ethics is defined by anything other than RECIPROCITY it is no longer internally consistent (no high trust commons, no agency, no forwarding your claimed values). That’s the beauty of…

  • Morality = Reciprocity

    MORALITY = RECIPROCITY You don’t understand. it’s empirical. scientific. It doesn’t matter what you i or anyone else opines. You are welcome to falsify (a) goods and bads refer to caloric income or loss, existential or projected (b) morality refers to reciprocity. (c) it’s a necessity of the physical universe. (d) the human biological reward…

  • . . .

    –“It is common for people to confuse the good (productive) with the moral (reciprocal).”– Curt Doolittle

  • “Curt, Please Define Mindfulness?”

    “CURT, PLEASE DEFINE MINDFULNESS?” —“What do you mean when you use the word “mindfulness”?”— Andrew Cordeaux @AndrewCordeaux 1) I mean the physical, cognitive and emotional discipline to control the subject of attention on the present intent, insulated from distractions whether personal, environmental, or interpersonal. 2) But with preference for the stoic method (self authoring, virtues…

  • Can You Relate In-Group vs Out-Group to Morality = Reciprocity

    —“Can you relate in-group vs out-group to morality = reciprocity ?”—Scott Claremont Morality = Rules of cooperation INGROUP VS OUTGROUP 1. Ingroup, 2. outgroup … a. outgroup trade, … b. outgroup boycott, … c. outgroup competitor, … d. outgroup parasite … e. outgroup predator Ingroup by definition = cooperation (moral) Ingroup always requires reciprocity. Ingroup…

  • –“What Is Your Opinion of Monarchy”—

    –“WHAT IS YOUR OPINION OF MONARCHY”— Monarchy (which is a purely christian european order, in which kings are crowned by the church, as an insurer of their fitness), has been limited by traditional (indo european then germanic law) of individual sovereignty, interpersonal reciprocity, truthful testimony, promise, and contract. Russian Tzars had dictatorial power, European monarchs…

  • Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying in International Politics – Book and Video Link

    WHY LEADERS LIE: THE TRUTH ABOUT LYING IN INTERNATIONAL POLITICS – BOOK AND VIDEO LINK by John J. Mearsheimer VIDEO AMAZON LINK In Why Leaders Lie, Mearsheimer provides the first systematic analysis of lying as a tool of statecraft, identifying the varieties, the reasons, and the potential costs and benefits. Drawing on a wealth of…

  • Some Say “the Fact that The Right Hasn’t Already Started a Physical Fight Means They Are Too Apathetic to Ever Fight”

    SOME SAY “THE FACT THAT THE RIGHT HASN’T ALREADY STARTED A PHYSICAL FIGHT MEANS THEY ARE TOO APATHETIC TO EVER FIGHT” (FALSE – CHANGING CIRCUMSTANCES CHANGE THE RISK/REWARD EQUATION) The grassroots Right (individuals, families) has had somewhere to run. To the suburbs, to a red state. And hope of “maybe we can win the next…

  • . . .

    “But above all things [prince] must keep his hands off the property of others, because men more quickly forget the death of their father than the loss of their patrimony.” …. “A prince ought to inspire fear in such a way that, if he does not win love, he avoids hatred; because he can endure…

  • Strategy for Engaging with Civic Nationalists

    STRATEGY FOR ENGAGING WITH CIVIC NATIONALISTS Civic nationalists are instinctive conservatives who are “on our team” but due to ignorance of how racially tribal/ethnocentric nonwhites are (western whites are unique in our relative lack of ethnocentrism/racial tribalism), decades of “equality” propaganda and lies, coupled with sincere lack of ill-will toward nonwhites (niceness/generosity), advocate/support legal nonwhite…

  • Do We Need to Be United Around Via-Positivas (“Should Do”)? and Should It Be “all About Race?”

    DO WE NEED TO BE UNITED AROUND VIA-POSITIVAS (“SHOULD DO”)? AND SHOULD IT BE “ALL ABOUT RACE?” (Answer to a couple of good questions.) Reciprocity is a via-negativa law (“you can’t do xyz”), not a via-positiva (“we must/should do abc”) though it can be expressed as a via-positiva (“we need to enforce reciprocity”). On the…

  • . . .

    —“Overproduction of Outrage has decreased its purchasing power.”—

  • Yes, Norms Are Common Property

    YES, NORMS ARE COMMON PROPERTY by Martin Stepan —“So if such a thing as via-positiva norms do exist, is it possible for there to be violations of reciprocity by not adhering to said via positive norms? Or would this just be considered to be a violation of someone’s notion of the “the good”, and therefore…

  • “Modern Day Founding Fathers”

    —“Also since I got your attention, I have never felt relief from discovering a political theory but propertarianism is genius. You and John mark are doing amazing work, truly modern day founding fathers. So thank you for doing this. It’s restored my faith for a better tomorrow.”—The Cultural Oncologist @CultureKancer Made my day. 

  • P: We Operationalize the Series (statement) Not the Elements (evidence)

    Sep 28, 2019, 8:31 AM P: WE OPERATIONALIZE THE SERIES (Statement) NOT THE ELEMENTS (Evidence) —-“Your proclamation as being scientific is also interesting considering the most interesting of your formulations are extrapolations (grammar “word->word”, non-operational, but well condensed.”— Twitter (That’s a great question. Very few people have the insight to ask it.) The Methodology: Disambiguation…

  • A Question About the Cortex

    A QUESTION ABOUT THE CORTEX —“Does the commensurability of the edge of the cerebral cortex require fractal geometry, like a coastline? Does it have self similarity?”—The Nationalist @Nationalist7346 No. the outer layer of the cortex is just a couple of mm thick; consists two functions (what,where), using six layers; divided into columns and modules (groups…

  • ORRGSM Is a Resource, Just Like Violence

    GSRRM like Violence for which it is a substitute, is simply a resource. The question is what you are using the resource for … punishing the dissemination of undesirable truth and demand for reciprocity, or punishing the dissemination of falsehood and ir-reciprocity.

  • Because of The Technique Used to Sell and Argue the Abrahamic Religions

    BECAUSE OF THE TECHNIQUE USED TO SELL AND ARGUE THE ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS —“Can you explain how that paradigm is Abrahamic?”— Sean-Vernon Sutherland (Referring to capitalism vs socialism instead of rule of law and arbitrary rule) Using the method of persuasion consisting of false promise, pilpul, and critique (undermining) by which the abrahamic religions of the…