[W]e are always ruled. We are often governed. The law is the minimum rule. We can never escape law and commons and hold territory.
We spend far too much ink on how to insure good rule, government, rulers, and governors.
And we cannot make a good ruler or governor. We spend too little ink on universal standing and juridical defense from rulers and governors.
This is because we not only seek advocacy of political orders in order to rally allies with whom me seek advantage from both rule and government – but would be constrained ourselves by rule of law if our preferred leaders obtained it.
All political advocacy in favor of one form of rule, or one form of government, and another, is an attempt to circumvent the cost of exchange.
But if I am correct – and the science increasingly suggests so – then we libertarians are partly morally blind, progressives are almost entirely morally blind (libertarians and progressives) and conservatives not only see clearly but are over-sensitive. And all attempts at political power are merely attempts to circumvent voluntary exchanges of cooperation that occur in the family, tribe and market.
Rule that prohibits parasitism in the tribe, market and government forces us to conduct voluntary exchanges (compromises) none of which are optimum for the long term capital accumulators (conservatives), medium time frame producers (libertarians) and short time frame consumers(progressives).
Just as we use voluntary exchange in the market to organize production, distribution, trade, and consumption, we organize the production of commons via government. But if government is not a vehicle for the facilitation of trade between the long(conservative), medium(libertarian), and short(progressive) factions, it is no different from not possessing a free market for the production goods and services, an not possessing money to signal demand.
When free market advocates call for infinitely open markets this imposes costs on the other factions. When socialists call for redistribution this imposes costs on the other factions. When Conservatives call for the payment of normative costs, this imposes a cost on the other factions.
But if we instead of imposing costs upon one another, conduct trades, then those costs are the expenses that we pay to cooperate on means despite our cognitively biased different ends.
Cooperation lets a species specialize. Cooperation by voluntary exchange lets us specialized without dying off and producing a new generation.
Cooperation by voluntary exchange collects information from the specialists in intertemporal reproduction: short consumption progressives, medium productive libertarians, and long term, conservative capital accumulators.
By satisfying the wants of all through voluntary exchange, together we ‘calculate’ the optimum possible reproduction for all, the same way that the market calculates the optimum possible production for all.
If I have not converted you to market production of commons (a market government) consisting of at least four if not five houses, each of which splits by gender, then hopefully at least I will help you understand mankind’s long struggle to increase the scope and rewards of cooperation by the use of market and voluntary exchange to produce the information necessary for us to act in our collective interests.
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine (Tallinn, Estonia)
One response to “Our Mistaken Emphasis on Government Rather than Juridical Defense From It.”
[…] OUR MISTAKEN EMPHASIS ON GOVERNMENT INSTEAD OF JURIDICAL DEFENSE FROM IT https://propertarianism.com/2015/08/24/our-mistaken-emphasis-on-government-rather-than-juridical-def… […]