STRATEGIES NOT STEADY STATES
Communism
…. (lower class – short term – consumption – r-selection )
…. (mandatory consumption)
…. (reproductive offense – distribution of assets )
…. (strength in numbers)
Market Government
…. (middle class – medium term – production)
…. (mandatory exchange)
…. (productive offense – market exchange of assets)
…. (strength in adaptation/evolution)
Fascism
…. (upper class – long term – preservation – K-selection)
…. (mandatory production/contribution)
…. (organizational offense – concentration of assets)
…. (strength in ability[resources])
Innovative < —————- > Defensive
…. …. …. Communism (universalism) (impossible)
…. …. Socialism (competitively impossible)
…. Social Democracy (possible as long as competitive)
Market Government (Trade) …. Anarchism (impossible)
….Classical-Liberalism, (competitively possible)
…. ….Christian Monarchism (competitively possible)
…. …. ….Fascism (particularism)
We alter between these strategies as our prosperity allows.
—Curt
One response to “Strategies – Not Steady States”
[…] MODELS OF GOVERNMENTS ARE STRATEGIES IN A GIVEN CONTEXT, NOT UNIVERSAL GOODS https://propertarianism.com/2016/10/15/strategies-not-steady-states/ […]