Full Definition: Baiting Into Hazard

—“You often say “bait into hazard”, any chance you could explain that in more depth? I don’t really get what you mean. Are you talking about moral hazard in economics? And what’s the baiting?”—

[I]t’s short for the Abrahamic (Jewish, Muslim, Semitic, Cognitively-Female) technique of undermining host civilizations (groups):

“Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty, by Plausible Deniability, Despite Deliberate Failure of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s), And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (profit), Influence(power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Conflict, Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”

That paragraph may require multiple reads, so that you follow the full sequence. It is the genetic conflict strategy of females who must manage children by half truths, compete and cooperate with other women by half truths, and influence or undermine the dominance hierarchy of men with half truths, using the suite of disapproval, ridicule, shaming, scolding, psychologizing, moralizing, gossiping, rallying, and if necessary psychotic episodes (female version of anti-social behavior) to obtain her interests – because she cannot otherwise compete by production, trade, knowledge, argument, or violence.

Males fight to the point of compliance with position in the hierarchy (duty and loyalty), while females undermine to the point of ostracization or death (submission, destruction). This strategy is universal among primates as well as most mammals capable of social organization.

Semitic Civilization and its institutionalization of the female means of conflict, is the antithesis of European, Indian and Eastern civilization: it is the source of the last Semitic Dark Age of superstition, ignorance, and denial by Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and Islam to consume and destroy. And it’s the same technique used to bring about the second Semitic Dark Age – this time of Pseudoscience (including economic innumeracy) and Sophism in the forms of Jewish Marxism to instigate conflcit between the classes, Jewish Postmodernism cause conflict by undermining conformity to high trust norms, Jewish Denialism that we call Political Correctness to deny truth, all under the false promise that equality – ever desirous of the female given her demand for consumption – is possible. When the entire point of jewish cosmopolitan universalism in this age, like jewish supernatural universalism in the last, is merely to undermine the aristocratic civilizations that by use of truth, contract, markets, heroism, excellence, and eugenics, dragged mankind kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the vicissitudes of a nature all but deliberately hostile to man.

Evolution provided women with verbal means of warfare just like it provided men with physical means of warfare. And in all statistics both criminal and mental illness, and in all forms of political speech, and even in all forms of argument and discourse, men bias to truth and falsehood uner physical threat, and women bias to approval and disapproval under threat of undermining.

Men are Political and Military super predators but Women are Social and Political super predators. This is the reason for women’s disenfranchisement from political participation in history, and the reason for women’s historical reputation as the root of all evil “discord”.  Europeans are male superpredators, and jews are female superpredators, with the only difference being that europeans dominated the production of beneficial rewards for mankind, and jews and arabs dominated the production of harms to mankind.

Now let’s try to work through a few more definitions.

A hazard refers to a circumstance that has the potential to cause harm to a vulnerable target, that lacking knowledge, and-or, having incentives, that might bait him into harm. i.e. Something as simple as an area prone to flooding, or landslides. In Washington State there are old coal mines in the mountains that periodically collapse internally, creating voids in the surface, you can fall into and die – swallowed by the earth.

Any condition where an asymmetry of knowledge (ignorance) can lead another person to harm. i.e. earthquake, landslide, hurricane and tsunami; a barrel of toxic chemicals; powered construction equipment. A ditch or foundation that may cave in on workers.

A failure of due diligence in defending others against a hazard you are either aware of or have created. i.e. a failure to cover a well-hole that a child can fall into. Old but common one: refrigerators with locking doors left at junkyards with the door on, so that children can get inside, suffocate, or starve, and die.

When a party with more information about its actions or intentions has a tendency or incentive to behave against the interests of the other party with less information.  Usury, Prostitution, and Drugs are the most common moral hazards. The most common topic on law involves insurance schemes, where one is incentivized to commit arson or murder simply because one has insurance on the building or person.

That should cover Hazard. Now let’s deal with False Promise:

The most common type are psychological false promises: Life after death as Freedom from Death, followed by freedom from knowledge of one’s value to others: Marxism as Freedom from Competition for Production in the Market between Classes, Feminism as freedom from the compromise between the genders, Postmodernism as freedom from  sexual, social, economic, political, and military market value, freedom from paying the costs of conformity to high trust norms, traditions, institutions, and laws, and even freedom from Truth, Reason, and Science.

Using sophism and overloading to make excuses that convince you (sell you), baiting you into the hazard. Where sophism is a fallacious argument used deliberately to deceive. Among the sophisms are the ‘big lies” that involve the three techniques of constructing big lies that we call Fictionalisms: Magic to Pseudoscience, Surrealism to Idealism, Supernatural to Theological.

Using undermining and sophism and decets – particularly straw man false arguments – to undermine your due diligence or falsify the experience and evidence.

Using numbers of people, propaganda, information, symbols to overload your reason and cause you to fall prey to false promise, pilpul and critique so that our primary means of defense from falsehood – competition in a market for information with others who might disagree – is impossible.


If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. If I entice you into buying drugs, i’m baiting you in to a hazard, since addiction is a spiral.

If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution.

If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard.

if I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard.

In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap – because you TRUST but your ability to FALSIFY has been undermined through a technique we call “suggestion and overloading”.  Suggestion and Overloading force you to appeal to intuition and emotion despite  your reason. So just as you can be overwhelmed by too much information or too much stimulation or too much excitement or fear, you can be overloaded for the purpose of deceiving you intentionally.

In the case of western civilization, our high trust society is most vulnerable to the Jewish, and Muslim Semitic and Cognitive Female means of undermining precisely because our civilization’s history, traditions, institutions, and laws consist of markets that guarantee sovereignty and choice, under the presumption that those who make poor decisions will learn from them. Unfortunately, false promises that it is possible to defeat physical (material) and natural (behavioral) laws of nature, that can be cast as oppression by the (Parental, Paternal) aristocracy, and therefore escaped – when they cannot be except by equality in devolution into dysgenia, ignorance, superstition, pseudoscience, and poverty.

Only European males developed Heroism and Excellence, Promise and Contract, Truth and Oath, Sovereignty and Reciprocity, Natural law and Jury, and the resulting Markets in association, cooperation, reproduction, production, polities, and War.

We are the only people sufficiently masculine on earth to speak truth before face regardless of cost, and to force this martial testimony down into every layer of the population other than the underclasses. And until the Jewish Postwar Invasion even our women largely spoke truthfully.

How do we reverse this second Jewish Dark age?  By extending the prohibition on hazardous speech from commercial to  financial, economic, political, strategic, and scientific speech, thereby holding every issue of speech in public to the public on matters public involuntarily warrantied, and involuntarily liable, and where we prosecute with vigor those who make false promises that bait into hazard.

“Sovereign” means that every man is his own country own legislature and own army, limited only by natural law – do not impose costs upon others that would cause them to retaliate against you for your actions – intentional or not.

Leave a Reply