SELF DETERMINATION

2.1 Restore the Federation of Several States:

Restoration of the American Project as a repeat of the thousand-year successful European project, as a federation of Sovereign States (countries) under military, court, treasury, insurer, while maintaining rights under natural law, but devolving “liberty” – under the original meaning of “the right to retain local custom” that does not violate the law or the rights, replicating the successes of the Trifunctionalism of The Holy Roman Empire, The Traditional Law, and the Catholic Church, in secular scientific, and legal form, while allowing peoples to produce those commons most suitable to there interests.

2.2 Restoring the constitution to its original intention of a large number of small European states, each serving the interests of their citizens.  

Thus fixing six major holes in our constitution, including the full enumeration of our rights, so that there is no more ‘legal interpretation’ of anything, or legislation from the bench, or laws that ‘pass’ before they are known legal, and understood. And where legislators are personally liable for life for the legislation they approve. This is the most important but most technical aspect of our movement. We have been told it’s the government that matters. It isn’t. It’s rule of law that matters. And governments limited to rule of law that make the European miracles of the ancient and modern worlds possible.

2.3 Restore Political Power and Choice To The States:

Limiting the federal government to original intent, as defense of the continent and dispute resolution over property between the states. Closing all federal agencies except defense, court, treasury, interior, research, and insurer of last resort (benefits). Devolving the rest – social and political preferences – to the states. Then states can create social, economic, and political policies that suit their interests while preserving the territorial integrity and financial security of our continent. So the different ‘american nations’ can customize life to their cultural wants and needs.

2.6 – Restore The Market for Commons in the Legislature: 

Restoration of our system of government to one of houses of the classes for the purpose of producing commons by trades, and out of majoritarian mob rule the English were correct – and the French, as always, were wrong. And the conversion of Acts of legislation to Contracts of the Commons explicitly placing their contents and enforceability as inferior to the Law.

2.7 – Restore Monarchies and if Possible Nobilities

Nobility: Intergenerational Capital
One of the more minor but meaningful mistakes of our ancestors was to eliminate the value of monarchy and nobility intstead of subject them to equality under the law. This was, at the time, a pragmatic choice, that in retrospect was damaging, because monarchy and nobility give families an incentive to produce intergenerational capital of all forms that continously improve the commons and the people, leading to ‘europe being a vast open air museum’. Whereas, unfortunately, ‘renters’ (politicians), especially elected politicians, are pressured into and incentivized to universalize the tragedy of the commons. If we are to correctly frame our degeneration as a civilization it is reducibl to the tragedy of the commons: privatization of accumulated capital for the benefit of all.

One of the worst misakes the USA has made is the conversion of the senate to a directly elected body instead of a substitute for the governors of the states, given the distance between the states and the capitol of the federation. Similarly one of the worst mistakes the british have made is the degredation of the house of lords, away from those with intergenerational interests in the condition of the state and the people. The house of lords acted as a limit on the ‘fashions and passions’ of the people. The senate was likewise designed to act as a limit on the ‘fashions and passions’ of the people. And while the british lacked a constitution and supreme court, the house of lords filled that role for not only the law, but for the culture itself.  

Now we have taken pains in our reforms to the constitution to prohibit degeneracy by simply measuring all capital in the commons and preventing privatization by private AND public institutions. You get what you measure. We would not have the high crimes against the commons in San Francisco or Los Angeles or Chicago today if we conducted that full accounting. So we are including that full accounting so that houses of nobility (intergenerational responsibility for people culture state constitution and civilization) can play that role in addition to the courts, but where we still have appeal to the courts.

Monarchies: Judges of Last Resort
Given the history of propaganda to undermine the monarchies, despite the record of monarchies, and despite the catastrophes of those nations that have abandoned them, it is all but impossible to convince Americans that the British model of a constitutional monarchy serving as “judge of last resort”, in case any or all of the military, legal, political, economic and social procedures, and processes fail – as they are frequently want to do.

But the logic and evidence are clear that a monarchy as judge of last resort, rule of law by natural law, and the supremacy of the law, multiple houses of parliament or congress, a professional cabinet, and a prime minister, are the optimum form of democratic government in an educated, industrialized, prosperous and democratic christian European polity. And withing that optimum system of government, Monarchies are the final defense against fashions of the people, failure of political processes, and usurpation by our enemies.

2.8 Reorganization of Elites from Credentialist(Hypothetical) to Meritocracy(Demonstrated competency)

a) Restore Competent and Replace Credentialed Government. With the rise of Communism and Socialist Atheistic totalitarian States, vs the Prussian protestant administrative State, vs the French Catholic administrative state, and their superiority at organizing war and economy, the west gradually accepted the ‘Managerial’ state revolution – meaning the more benevolent (‘liberal’) version of the sequence of Leninist > Prussian > French > Anglosphere. The illusion of the benefits of the managerial state took root in europe, a bit less so in the UK, and less so in the USA – though it is arising in Canada as it did in europe, and it’s attempting to in Australia and New Zealand. 

Secondly, with the postwar demand for scientific, technological, medical, and political competitive advantage, we generated a new class of credentialists that did not have experience in military, industry, or pre-war state governmnet that was largely one of economic progression and social integration.

This combination of credentialism, growth of the administrative state, and the long feedback loop on the failures of the administrative state, converted our government from a majority of people with demonstrated competency managing people and resources in the real world, to a majority, and now a near exclusivity of people lacking demonstrated competency managing people and resources in the real world. And these credentialists are (a) in vast over supply (b) motivated to pursue political extremes to build alliances and careers, rather than demonstrated competency in improving the competitive position of the polity and the state.  

Solution:  (Purge, closure, teach natural law constitution, test, reconstruction, regulations and policies pass congress. liability for all persons in decision chain. Basically we want to move people from military and industry into government after they’ve demonstrated competency and ‘paid for the privilege’.)

b) Professionalizing vs Credentializing Government Employees: We have no means of certifying that the people in the government understand the natural law the constitution of natural law, concurrency, or commonality, the transactional nature of law, testimonal truth, reciprocity, demonstrated interests, language as weights and measures of the time, nor that they have a basic understanding of the laws of the universe, whether physical, behavioral, or evolutionary. Yet we have certifications for therapists, psychiatrists, doctors, lawyers, accountants, and investment advisors. (Need test of natural law, constitution, rights and obligations, and transactional government. note: one of our key contributions is the ability to test for competency for government. Or more colloquially, “if you want to wear a tie, we can then use it as a noose”-BH)

(Goal: “Make it difficult to impossible for bad people to get into government, survive in government, and evade prosecution in government.”)

2.9 Provide Self Determinaton By State Formation for Everyone

Allowing voluntary state formation with only 300k people (the population of Iceland or the Dakotas). In most cases we will see many small states form and they will be more like the princedoms of the Holy Roman Empire (Greater Germany) that the founders were trying to imitate. This creates small homogeneous polities with low power distance, with limited difference in interests.

2.10 – Restore the Sovereignty of the Several States

We begin by defining different political organizations, rights, responsibilities and inalienations of each. Our purpose here is to account for the difference in opportunity costs between small territories with dense popoulations and lower inidual responsibility and lower opportunity costs and larger less dense populations with higher inidual responsibility and higher opportunity costs. Thus we preserve the requirement for concurrency between polities and we prevent the race to the bottom by majorities.

• Territories, Possessions,
• City States, States, Regions,
• Cities, Districts, Counties, Shires,
• Towns, Villages, and Homesteads
• Gypsies, Seasonal Migrants, Vagrants, Dysfunctionals, Addicts, The Mentally Ill

The strategic security of the north american island continent is such that the value may not be compromised by any without imposing an intolerable cost on the rest. As such we are constrained to the integrity of the continent as a federation in prohibition of the threat caused by such an alienation. (French Quebec is bad enough as it is)

The same applies to the island of Britain, Australia or New Zealand, or the   ‘world island’ of eurasia, or vast continent of africa: there is very little difference between racial presence, civilizational boundaries, ethnic boundaries within them, and the many federations of nation states that logically arise within them. There are territorial constraints and ‘torn countries’ that bridge civilizations. it’s these torn countries and zones of compeition, contention and conflict that generate wars, destruction, suffering, and death. 

The territory is and always will be a commons of the federation. So all are constrained to the use of natural resources, limiting to usus and prohibiting abusus both intergenerational and by externalization of costs. Thus the governmentn and the people  have sovereignty in usus but not of abusus.

We guarrantee the right to self determination thus preventing hoarding of territories rather than distributing territories to suit the wants and needs of our differences, and enumerate the criteria necessary for self determination of any territory and it’s people by the formation of a polity.

We guarrantee a republican government of Rule of Law of Natural Law, Commonality, Concurrency, and Liberty in the production of economy, culture, and custom – because it is the only moral government possible under the natural law of cooperation for the benefit of all, and together for the benefit of man.

We provide a Menu (set of choices) for different methods of regional, state, and
local government, that conform to this reupblican government, the constitution and the natural law because human groups prefer and often need different means of decision making and management because of different trust structures in the populations, different ersities that cause that trust differences, and different degrees of complexity that increase the demand for greater generalization (abstraction) of government decisions by general rules.

We place limits on bureaucracies, legislation, and especialy externalization of costs against demonstrated interest – some of which may result from simple differences in preference or local philosophy between higher capitalization and higher consumption and impulse satisfaction polities.

In general we prohibit conspiracy by any organization of polities against the interests of other polities or the federation.

In specific we limit the autonomy and behavior of the governments and the polities from undermining neighbors, other states, or the federation, with harsh penalties for even proposing such.

The reasoning is simple: there are basic human behaviors, largely for satisfaction and status, that are both genetic, cultural, and economic, and the genetic, cultural, and economic continuously reinforce one another. By providing all people with a market for polities we provide a range of cultures in which to satisfy our need for mindfulness, belonging, shared ambitions, and the joy of achieving them together, but we are limited to not imposing the costs of doing so on other polities – preserving natural law of cooperation and as such our cooperation with one another for our mutual benefit.

2.11 – Separate Urban Inidualism and Consumption from the Suburban and Rural Familism and Capitalization.

Separate Blue Cities: The conversion of Deep Blue Immigrant Cities to City-States, in the tradition of “Free Cities” of the European Tradition under the Holy Roman Empire.

The Blue Cities have violated the Constitution, and effectively seceded already. We convert blue cities to city-states in the European Free Cities model, to contain them. Letting them have ‘multicultural’ social policies and the rest of us have what we want – decency, and priority of family. Thus preventing the blue cities and the Democratic party – that have been destroying the country one city at a time – from taking the rest of our civilization down with them. As such this is a repetition of the containment policy against communism, and communism’s transformation from class warfare against European civilization into multiculturalism and socialism against European civilization.

This will account for nearly half of the population. These cities have intentionally defected from the American and European Project in pursuit of the profits for Elites under of The Cosmopolitan Project. We have made bankruptcy possible for States. Our expectation is that as the continued competitive advantage of the States declines, these cities will continue to bankruptcy, write down their debts, restructure, the remaining ‘conservative’ people will flee, causing more reforms, but that over the century they will adapt to necessity. These cities will follow global norms of a small White, Jewish, or East Asian central district surrounded by slums. But the contagion will be contained, and while these cities will continue to die off, new core cities will form outside of them but under the Law and Constitution that has criminalized Cosmopolitan policies.

So the present crisis begs we present the facts, and let the people decide to continue the false promise of politics that has led us here, or return to the demonstrated evidence that constitutional monarchs with powers of assent and dissent but not initiative, are necessary for the preservation of a free people.

2.12 Restore Voluntary Association and Disassociation

Restore Voluntary Association and Disassociation so that we can one again regulate norms and culture to our preferences: Among those rights and obligations is the right to freedom of association and dissociation thereby ending forced integration. So that those who wish inidual expression and hyperconsumption can revel in it, and those of us who put family and commons before self can create the safe secure aesthetically pleasing lifestyles – and the self discipline, and intolerance for selfishness that goes with it. We are no longer alike enough to share neighborhoods, cities, territories, or political orders – that was the purpose of multiculturalism: to stop integration into Western civilization and the high trust commons and results of them, that all other civilizations envy.

Solutions:

• Constitution: The State
• Constitution: The Government of the State
• Constitution: The Government of the Several States