“Negotiation”

The Laws of Logic and Language

( … )

THIS ARTICLE IS FOR DECIDABILITY AND GRAMMARS.
RECIPROCITY->TRUTH are under rights and obligations.

There are three states of logic, in order from more certainty to less:

1. False certainty (Negative)
… 2. Truth candidate (actionable) (Positive)
3. Undecidable (In-actionable) (Collapse)

There are States of Truth in the Spectrum of Demand for Truth

1. Incoherent – Meaningless
2. … Coherent but inconsistent with satisfying the demand for decidability
3. … … Coherent and Consistent but Insufficient to satisfy the demand for decidability
4. … … … Coherent, Consistent, Correspondent and Sufficient to satisfy the demand for decidability (TRUE)
5. … … Ideal Truth (unknowable)
6. … Analytic Truth (internally consistent)
7. Tautological – Meaningless, Redundant, Violates continuous recursive disambiguation.

There is a spectrum of Testimony

1. Dishonesty
… 2. Honesty – Surviving Due Diligence against deceit
… … 3. Performative Truth – Due diligence against inference bias: loading, framing, obscuring…) – surviving due diligence by self-testing. (TRUE)
… 4. Untestifiable Ideal Truth – If one had perfect knowledge, paradigm, vocabulary – surviving application in the market – surviving market due-diligence against ignorance and error.
5. Analytic Truth
6. Tautology.

There are states of Knowledge in the Spectrum of Knowledge

0. Ignorance
… 1. Auto-Association > Survive Rational Self-Test > Hypothesis
… … 2. Survive Empirical Demonstration Test > Theory
… … … 3. Survive Empirical Applied Market Test > Settled Science
… … … … 4. Survive Reduction to First Principles > Law (No term of behavioral equivalency)
… … … 5. Surviving but increasing in causal precision
… 6. False