There’s a big difference between “shit talking” and scientific observation, analysis and argument. It’s not taking NS and adding some sprinkles or something to make it better. P-laws foundations are much more complete, it’s not just a revamp of NS. It takes an analysis of the third reich at this more complete level or methodology and says where it got things right and where it got things wrong. P is a methodology of falsification. It falsifies anything that can be falsified, which means it slaughters sacred cows. Many believe that NS is the solution while ignoring that it failed. Much like the communists do with “muh real communism”. It just didn’t work. Complete scientific law hasn’t been tried (because it hadn’t really been discovered till Curt) and when natural law has been tried, it’s lasted a whole lot longer than NS (Rome, British empires, and the US). I like NS, but it’s a pipe dream to think it can be resurrected as it was in its final state in the past and win with that strategy.
People are looking for something to rally behind, a symbol, a man, an idea. Curt’s work doesn’t provide that so people want to defend their sacred cows.