We Can Cure The Era of Lies

We are not ALL Americans. We never have been. Our revolutionary war was a civil war. We nearly had a civil war after 1812, we had one in 1861, we nearly had one during the great depression, we nearly did in the sixties, and we are in one at present. Nine Nations of North America.

Democrats aren’t an American, but ‘useful idiots’ of the globalist (Bolshevik) initiative to destroy western civilization as Rome by taking advantage of our inability to continue the practice of market eugenics under universal democracy if we have a large non-European underclass.

Too big to fail applies to the federal government. The USA was designed as was the Holy Roman Empire using Germanic law, as practiced in Germanic England, informed by French thought, as a traditionally weak central government for the common defense of sovereign micro-states.

Micro States produce commons, politics, culture, and institutions suiting the genetic demographics, and degree of evolution, of their populations, while benefitting from shared juridical and military defense between one another and foreigners. They cooperate by trade – not commons.

The United States would result in something on the order of 300 microstates, with various norms traditions laws, and regulations, with blue cities forming city-states, and the rest forming constantly changing territorial states. This would allow very different polities.

When you understand our ancient anglo germanic Aryan common law tradition of self-determination and adversarial judgment as a market for the continuous elimination of ignorance, error, bias, deceit, and crime, then you’ll see how west continues physically and social evo. with mind.

Each civilization takes for granted (as metaphysics) its group strategy. We don’t even know them ourselves. I explain the west’s group strategy in its totality and our strategy in world context: discovery adaptation to and application of the laws of the universe -the least lies.

The West BYPASSED the Religion(underclass) and State (upper class) phases of development just as east Asians bypassed the ‘cheque’ and in some cases, the credit card stages of banking – and went right to rule of law (middle class) development. But the non-middle classes revolt.

The West: Continuous Rapid Evolution by incremental suppression of ignorance, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, obscurantism, fictionalisms, deceit, denial, free riding, conspiracy, fraud, theft, violence, killing via markets for goods, services, information, and justice.

Europeans (Conservatives (capitalizers)) TESTIFY. Non-Europeans (Progressives (hyper consumers)) Gossip, Shame, Rally, Ridicule, Moralize, Psychologize, Undermine, Destroy Reputation, Doxx, conservatives so that ‘progressives’ can try to justify stealing from them.

European Tradition: Humans are no different from other domesticated animals, and can only be granted as much freedom to do harm as they demonstrate agency by NOT doing it. Democracy without demonstrated ability was a catastrophe.

“Individualism” is a bit of harmful sophistry that obscures the underlying truth: in the west alone can we earn freedom(self), liberty(group), and sovereignty(for all), for the simple reason that the first principle of western civilization is self-determination via reciprocity.

The Abrahamic method of deceit involves storytelling not testifying. It’s through storytelling rather than testifying that loading, framing, suggesting, obscuring, fictionalizing, deceit, and denial are produced. Training the human brain to think in lies isn’t hard – saturate it.

The Abrahamic (leftist) technique of baiting into hazard is a variation on the female “sh–t-test”. Economics: Rather than asking for something via reciprocity they undermine to generate demand for male action without implication of reciprocity(cost of sex, affection, care).

CORE P-LAW: The Female, Abrahamic, Leftist technique of baiting into hazard: Every single thing they do is bait ‘undermine’ superiors (dominant males) into hazard so that they can avoid costs of rational reciprocal exchange. Their present ‘revolt’ is the same. They’re parasites.

The Female, Abrahamic, Leftist, technique, advocated by Clinton-Obama mentor Saul Alinsky is to bait moral people into violence by taking advantage of the weakness in our law prohibiting breaking of the peace by shrilling, ridicule, and challenge, then accusing them of oppression.

They call this method ‘force them to break their own moral high ground’. The only solution of course is to restore our law of limiting our conflicts to the court and our competition to the market, prohibiting the female, Abrahamic, leftist technique of market circumvention. (war).

The first counter-revolution against civilization was by Judaism-Christianity and Islam using supernatural false promise. This second counter-revolution against civilization has been by pseudoscientific and sophomoric false promise. The revolt against European market eugenics.

“Marx(econ), Boaz(Anthropology), Freud (Psych), Frankfurt (culture), Derrida (social construction (lying)), Friedan (family), The HBD-Denial(Sci) and Woke Movements, are pseudoscientific and sophomoric revolts against Darwin’s explanation for European success: MARKET EUGENICS.”

Read Kevin MacDonald’s trilogy on the Jews to understand them. Read my work to understand the broader Abrahamic method of undermining and deceit, where it originates, the west’s group strategy, (all group strategies), why the west is vulnerable, and how to easily reform our laws.

Read Macdonald and then Doolittle (me) to understand the fall of Rome, the fall of the West – both because over-expansion into primitives without enforcing castes as a law against miscegenation, and sufficient core population to maintain ethnocentric army, ethnocentric law, ethnocentric rule, until primitive peoples are fully domesticated and capable of fitness for modernity. I’ll throw in advice that you watch Stephen Molyneux’s video on the fall of Rome which is still the best one that explains the parallel with the present age.

Studying the enemy is enough to end any presumption that man is innately moral. Instead, it’s an education in the depth of human immorality and the deceit and fraud we are capable of individually, culturally, and religiously. Abrahamism = Anti-Evolution = The Great Filter

Why Jews and Whites at the Extremes? Stereotypes are the most accurate measure in social science. White males are most likely to use testimonial prose, most innovative, and most credible (c)Jewish males don’t testify, are exceptional at social construction, and feminine method of undermining.

This appears to be a world universal, with rare exceptions, and we don’t yet know the distribution between genetic and cultural. Although the European vs Jewish elite differences appear to be at least as genetic as cultural. Jewish males serve as the elites for feminine strategy.

While other thinkers have arrived at similar conclusions in history, science confirms it. Because males and especially European or European Jewish males produce a wider distribution, and the Jews a wider mean and twice as many outliers, white/Jewish is statistically unavoidable.

The left is afflicted by its attempt to use social construction via speech(fantasy) to revolt against the formal (logical), physical (scarcity), natural (reciprocal, amoral), and evolutionary (regression to the mean, red queen) laws of the universe: natural selection.

If the left adopted soft eugenics (limiting reproduction to those who can compete in the market in the service of others) then their redistributive ambitions would be possible. Without soft eugenics, and with open immigration of underclasses, it’s impossible.

To make matters worse, the left must make false unwarrantable, unaccountable, and impossible promises, that bait the wishful and magical thinkers into the hazard of the impossible, while the Right, whose only material difference is that they demand market eugenic, resists.

So the failure of the utopianism of the ‘enlightenment’ was the presumption of the possibility of escaping the laws of the universe, rather than directing more of the proceeds of production to non-consumable (useful) commons instead of consumption and reproduction.

Pleasant lies are much cheaper than unpleasant truths creating an economic imbalance in favor of lies. And the left has innovated in lying faster than we innovate in truths to suppress their lies.

As an Example: Duchesne(Literary intellectual) > MacDonald (empirical scientific) > Doolittle (operational computational). The difference between these three models of argument is not only methodological, not only increase in precision, but a spectrum decreasing presumption of agency.

This sequence of philosophical > empirical > operational all occurred over the past century with operational, computational, and falsificationary as the endpoint of epistemology. And our delay in that evolution responsible for our failure to defeat the lies of the (((Left))).

And this sequence reflects the same progress we saw in Greek knowledge – and their failure to transition to the operational (computational) as we are failing by too slowly evolving the transition. The same potential was in Aristotle and Archimedes. (Just Joscha Bach and I)

I have, (we have) discovered and documented the operational algorithm for human behavior. In other words, described in software terms, the behavior of human beings, and it is TRIVIAL. It’s the creativity humans use in inventing lies to deny the laws of nature that’s complex.

We must spend more time on the falsification of lies than on the identification of truth.

Huntington argues that, as societies modernize, they become more complex and disordered. If this disorder is not matched by political and institutional modernization— which produces political institutions capable of managing the stress of modernization—the result is violence.

The problem is that Islam and Judaism resist organization – they were evolved as revolts against organization, so their entire civilization remains incapable of institutional formation and duration. That’s why they require parasitism on others to survive.

Post-communist (now fascist) China and post-soviet India appear to be doing it well, it’s the Semitic and se-islamic peoples that are by and large an ongoing political catastrophe. And they are the last people to modernize, the most resistant, and the most costly so far.

P-LAW provides systemic political and institutional modernization necessary for evolution of peoples FIT FOR MODERNITY. Unfortunately, without soft eugenics under P-Law most of the world – the majority – will remain unfit for modernity. That unfitness is the cause of the conflict.

Huntington invented the phrase Davos Man, for global elites who “have little need for national loyalty, view national boundaries as obstacles that thankfully are vanishing, and see national govts as residues whose only useful function is to assist the elite’s global ambitions”.

Huntington provoked international debate among theorists with “The Clash of Civilizations?”, he argued that, after the fall of the Soviet Union, Islam would become the obstacle to Western [civilization] of the world. The West’s next war would be with Islam [without, Jews within.]

In Huntington’s book, Who Are We? (2004) he describes a cultural threat from large-scale immigration by Latinos, that would “divide the United States in two cultures”. He called for forcing immigrants to “adopt English” and the U.S. to turn to Protestant religions to save itself.

It shouldn’t take years of study to filter through layer after layer of pseudoscience, ideology(fraud), sophistry (philosophy), pseudo-history, mythology, and theology to discover the very simple principles each civilization relies upon for its group evolutionary strategy.

It does. Because the truth is painful so we search for lies to deny it. The universe is not made for man. At best man is an experiment in an attempt to create us as the hand of nature and nature’s god – just as we produce tools of increasing precision, nature and nature’s god produces tools of increasing precision – precise enough to change the universe – or at least parts of it.

Retrospectively, I would prefer never having encountered the (((problem))) because understanding it, and how to reverse their war on humanity, required understanding of man, evolution, and civilization, which strips away the joy of life. Had they never existed joy might prevail.

Most thinkers, especially if they learn micro and behavioral economics, all come to similar conclusions. My work inherits primarily from Hayek, Sowell, Becker, Hoppe, and Popper-Kuhn. I just solved the problem. Because my Generation had Programming, AI, CogSci, and Genetics.

It’s a lot easier to follow other conservatives and libertarians because they moralize and complain, and you can empathize with their complaints and moralizing. I DO ACTIONABLE SOLUTIONS They require you to learn.

With a little effort, we can teach anyone and everyone how to identify and understand the Abrahamic method of deceit. Once you see how it is done, and how certain religions, cultures, and the left, make use of that system of lying you are immune to it, and can easily explain it.

You can learn more by following me(us) for three months than you can in four years of social science, economics, law, and history. Why? FIRST PRINCIPLES means FIRST CAUSES. P-Law is an operational algorithm consisting of first causes.

Leave a Reply