Category: Thoughts

Nearly everyone will miss my point (in the beauty of races and subraces). Sigh. How did I end up writing so much on race? It can only be because it’s one of the most common postmodern lies.

Hmm… —-”Are white people really the most beautiful race or do we just think that because we grew up being told that?”—- Well, sort of, yes. And we can measure it. However…. let’s explain why. Because it’s very interesting. In general, humans favor a certain set of ratios, and in general,…

Would you build a religion around Frodo Baggins? It would be a pretty good religion really. Why not the Trials of Achilles? I mean. that’s the ancient world’s ‘great book of inspiration.’ What about the trials of Alexander? What about the lives of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Zeno/Aurelius and Epicurus? …

(edited for clarity) Truth can only mean ‘descriptive testimony free of error, bias, suggestion, obscurantism and deceit’. In other words, speech, the semantic content of which corresponds with existentially possible reality. One speaks TRUTHFULLY, or UNTRUTHFULLY, or HONESTLY or DISHONESTLY. To be precise, one speaks HONESTLY not having done due diligence, nor…

Hello. I’m analytic philosopher. This is Part 3 of my walkthru of Chris’ CTMU paper. The Body. Chris’ text in italic, mine in normal font. I’ve worked through The remainder of the paper. And as usual, it doesn’t warrant further paragraph by paragraph analysis. It just took me a bit to get my arms around…

Hello. I’m analytic philosopher. This is Part 2 of my walkthru of Chris’ CTMU paper. The Introduction. Chris’ text in italic, mine in normal font. Bucking the traditional physical reductionism of the hard sciences, complexity theory has given rise to a new trend, informational reductionism, which holds that the basis of reality is not matter…

PART 1 – “THE ABSTRACT” Hello. I’m an analytic philosopher specializing in truthful (scientific and testimonial) speech. I’m going to just walk thru Chris’ paper using my normal process of trying to understand a theory. You might learn something from reading this analysis – even if not about Chris’s work, about what constitutes of truthful…

I thought he was just truthful. https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Milo-racist

That’s the wrong question. The question is, which has done the least damage? It’s pretty hard to argue that democrats have not done the most catastrophic and unrecoverable damage. And if I went into the list, I could write pages on it. https://www.quora.com/Which-political-party-has-done-the-most-good-for-the-US-Democrat-or-Republican

—-”Are white people really the most beautiful race or do we just think that because we grew up being told that?”—-Well, sort of, yes. And we can measure it. However…. let’s explain why. Because it’s very interesting. In general, humans favor a certain set of ratios, and in general, humans favor pedomorphism(retention of juvenile features)…

Truth can only mean ‘descriptive testimony free of error, bias, suggestion, obscurantism and deceit’. In other words, speech, the semantic content of which corresponds with reality. One speaks **truthfully**, or **untruthfully **(warrantied)**, **or** honestly **or** dishonestly **(not warrantied)**. ** To be precise, one speaks honestly or dishonestly having done no due diligence, and warrantying one’s…

My answer to How bad is it to live in North Beacon Hill (Seattle) and commute to Bellevue?

Technically, mathematics is a logic, not a science. Axioms can be declared = logic. Laws must be discovered and cannot be declared = science. One can model science with axioms, but it remains logic, not science. ie? STEM = “Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics”. -cheers

—“The first great lie of Abraham is “monotheism”. That there is a god, that there is a single god, that this god is knowable, that this god plays favourites. The rest flows from that.”— Howard Van Der Klauw

(in case you missed it, bill calls out something to ponder.) —“Because all axiomatic systems can eventually be internally justified, … it’s the survivability of the axioms (criteria of decidability) that they are dependent upon, rather than the explanatory power, and benefits of that explanatory power, that permit their survival as truth candidates.”— CD …

“HE WHO WILL FIGHT WITH ME SHALL BE MY BROTHER” OK. Say it again. Yes, I put my kin, tribe, nation, and race first – as I think all of us should. It’s the optimum strategy for everyone (really). That said, I don’t do racism. I actually hate it. I do CLASSISM. …

Curt Doolittle Yeah, well, …. That communism is a pseudoscientific restatement of the construction of destructive lies of abrahamism, including judaism->christianity->islam, is obvious. The fact that islam holds the world record or murder and destruction, with communism and christianity following in the wake, shouldn’t surprise us. the fact that putin plays to…

Curt Doolittle’s answer: It depends upon which ideology(‘Cult’) you subscribe to. I talk with people every day who do, and read papers, books, articles, posts, and tweets by people who do. But the two major cults argue (propagandize) quite differently: 1 – Pseudoscientific Marxist-Postmodern-Fe….

Minor movies worth watching if you haven’t seen them. The reason I want to call them out, is in part, that villenueve’s use of kubrick’s techniques combined is (thankfully) spreading into the indie and drama markets. Secondly, the use of increasingly layered plots is also becoming ‘a necessity’. (Whch we all attribute to…

All grammars limit the domains (property ranges) of semantic content. Semantic limits do not exist independent of grammars, but expand (inflate) fictionally or contract (deflate) operationally, empirically, and logically (meaning scientifically). In fact, the purpose of deflationary grammars is primarily to decrease deception, fiction, disambiguation, and dimensions, and therefore increase precision.

Moritz Bierling – thank you for all you do. The little stuff also matters.

–“What are you meaning by subatomic multipliers?”— Davin Eastley In economics, the term ‘multiplier’ means that more is gained than lost by the operation(transaction), ergo, in physics, a more complex organization is created and stable state retained. (or stated in economic terms, a more complex capital is formed.) (BTW: good question.)

(Adam Walker Gets It Right) by Adam Walker (CD: update, discussion link at end) There were a lot of good ideas exchanged in this discussion. The funny thing is Curt Doolittle’s work actually solves most of the conflicts in fundamental disagreements. Sargon wants to retain the autonomous sustainability of liberty…

OK. so I will make a painful set of observations that I promise are correct. 1) never, ever, every, extrapolate a curve. Almost every human error in intellectual history has been the result of doing so. 2) all phenomenon in the universe produces cycles of that repeat at increasing scales, because the maximum…

**—-“What is a good and recent book on the Irish economic model and the rise of the Celtic Tiger? The shorter and easier to understand the better, as I don’t have a background in economy.”—-** You don’t need to read a book. It’s too simple a subject for a book. 1) They provided **heavy…