Conspiracy of Common Interests vs Of Intent

—“Maybe I’m unclear on what you mean by intent. It seems to me incentives and intent are interlinked.”—Scott Strong

CONSPIRACY OF COMMON INTERESTS: Passively follow incentives to seize existing opportunity – and fail to not seize opportunity that is immoral.

CONSPIRACY OF INTENT: Actively work to create opportunities to seize because they are immoral.

CONSPIRACY OF IDIOCY: Actively work to crate opportunities to seize that are immoral because you falsely believe that they are moral (you justify them)

CONSPIRACY TO BAIT INTO HAZARD: Actively work to create opportunities for others to seize that produce immoral consequences.

THE NATURAL LAW ON MEDIA CONTENT

REGARDING: “News Outlets Are Liable for Others’ Facebook Comments, Australian Court Rules: Australian court says newspapers, TV stations that post their own articles should be considered publishers of defamatory comments”

1 – All copyright law is reduced to creative commons, and narrow interpretation. (Profound)
2 – All public speech: speech in public, to the public, in matters public must be testimonial form: Truthful, Reciprocal, Free of false promise, baiting into hazard, and proposing a competing solution that is truthful and reciprocal.
3 – Defamation by both libel (publication), and slander (speech) is restored.
4 – News (Twitter), Communication (Facebook), and Indexing (Google), as well as consumer banking, and consumer credit (visa/mc) are strategic infrastructure, and nationalized (the state takes a majority interest at the expense of investors as punishment for crimes against the people).
5 – Only content by Identity-Verified Individuals (credit card, phone number, drivers’ license, passport) may be shared outside of voluntary personal networks (friends, followers) by the publisher (platform). Identity of each individual determines jurisdiction of the individual.
6 – All individuals will be profiled for personality, moral, political, and religious biases (this is already extant). Individuals can opt into our out of jurisdictional, linguistic, moral, political, and religious biases (expose filters to users).
7 – Services will be provided for jurisdictions to (a) filter jurisdictions, (b) filter topics, (c) filter users, and (d) filter content. And jurisdictions may filter as they choose.
8 – Otherwise services may NOT filter content except pornography, gore, suicide, and crime.
10 – Services may NOT filter political content or any other content. Individuals that violate content selections will be limited to friends and followers networks. Or friends networks. Or destination (unshared). But they cannot be prohibited from direct voluntary communication within their voluntary network.
11 – All information about individuals, or produced by individuals is forever their property.
12 – All individuals have the right to be forgotten in entirety, but not selectively.

AS SUCH
All governments have the right and ability to self regulate platform content in their jurisdictions at their own cost, but may not externalize that cost nor involve the hosting service provider ( Platform ) in their internal matters. The united states will consider any attempt to externalize costs onto the service providers as a trade violation, and respond accordingly.

AS SUCH
The international network governance will be repatriated to the USG, and managed by a volunteer organization sworn to the USG law independent of all other law.

Jan 27, 2020, 11:30 AM
(hard questions) (life after death)

—“Is there life after death? Watching my father die recently has made me question my faith and the meaning of existence.”—James Louis LaSalle

Do socrates, Alexander, and Jefferson still live? Do your ancestors still live? Our current understanding of the universe is that it is constructed of information (differences in state). We certainly live on as information. We certainly live on as information in both genes, words, deeds, and the debt we pass on to our ancestors.

But does that information in any way exist such that our memories can be accessed, our experiences revisited, new experiences felt, or new memories formed? No.

Of this we are scientifically certain I’m afraid – although I won’t go into the completeness we see today. There is no room in the universe for information that can interact with any information we are capable of sensing.

Conversely can the fragments of our genes, words, deeds, be assembled in ‘gists’ in the minds of those that follow us? Of course. How many of us have been in an ancient place and felt the generations, centuries, millennia, aeons pass? How many of us can ‘feel’ the lives of the generations that have lived in a medieval house? A gothic church? A roman ruin? An oak grove.

We make marks upon genetic, physical, and informational existence. And as such we make marks on our perception of eternity, just as surely as a craftsman leaves a mark on stone, an author ink on parchment, a philosopher or scientist on man, a mother and father on the generations to follow.

The greatest mark we can make is a war of liberty, conquest, or genocide. It’s these marks we make as a people. But it is those marks we leave in genetics, in our arts and letters, and in knowledge, that live forever.

So is there a life after death? Of course not. It was a lie told to those in exchange for obedience – a novel form of cheap slavery. An addictive drug for the weak and ignorant. One of the great lies of history – a lie that violates reciprocity because it cannot be warrantied.

But do we persist after death?

Only in the capital we create that persists after us.
Bear young. Live well. Speak the truth. And exit this life having made works that leave the world better for your having lived in it.

This is the promise of our people.