Our Next Great Endeavour 

The Transcendence of Man

( … )

HOW DO WE DO IT

(list of revolutions – how each failed) oversimplification… church fail, fail because of church…

it, is as large a reformation as were the Aristotelian (reason), Augustinian(compromise); British empirical (first scientific); and the Darwinian era’s (second scientific) revolutions – and we should consider propertarianism’s position in intellectual history as the completion of the Darwinian scientific revolution of the 19th and 20th centuries, and the completion of the Aristotelian research program, fully disambiguating fictions (visions), theology (wishes); philosophy(choice), law (cooperation) and science(decidability), and completing the scientific method.

This completed scientific method also allows us to differentiate between reciprocal and truthful and ir-reciprocal and un-truthful speech. It’s a large project that reforms and modernizes every discipline.

This Completed Method (decidability).

The End of Warfare, the Suppression of War, Treason, Sedition, and Undermining,

The Eradication of False Promise and Deceit

The eradication of error, bias, deceit, fraud, and false promise from the commercial, financial, economic, political and strategic commons

The Restoration of The High Trust Society.

Why Is this Reformation Possible?

“Solves an Ancient Problem”

What Is It?

Part of positioning P-Law requires ending Confusion between Science, Logic, Law, and Philosophy. Logic says what must be, Science says what is, Law decides conflicts, Philosophy assists us in making choices – hopefully within the limits of law, science ,and logic. And Theology and Mythology provide us with wisdom that has survived over time in making those choices.

We can refer to the P-Law as any one of the following:

• The Completion of the Scientific Method
• The Science of Decidability across all domains
• The Science of Law: truth, testimony, reciprocity, and cooperation as the application of decidability across all domains.

Why the science of cooperation?

• QUESTION: What is the positive utility of resolving differences between humans other than to produce cooperation at the least possible friction?
• ANSWER: The only reason we need to know what is true, moral, and survivable, is to resolve disputes, resolve differences of knowledge, and produce as many reciprocally rewarding compromises as possible.

What Does It Consist Of?

• The Very Simple Law of the Universe
•  Methodology
  • The Completion of the Scientific Method
  • The Science of Decidability
  • The Formal Logic, Vocabulary, and Grammar of Decidability
• Applied Methodology
  • Application to the Sciences
  • The Unification of the Sciences
  • The Formal Logic of the Sciences  (the Wilsonian synthesis)
• Explanation of Man
  • The Explanation of Human Evolution and Human Behavior
  • The Explanation of individual, sex, group, and Civilizational Differences
  • The First Complete Statement of The Group Strategy of Western Civilization
  • An Explanation of our Present and Past Conflicts
  • An Explanation of Future Possibilities (including the Great Filter).
• Solution to the Conflict of our Age
  • A Universal Constitution and a Body of Law
  • A Set of Legislative and Policy Reforms
  • A moral license to demand those reforms
  • A means of revolution in the absence of reform

What’s The Objective? (Mission)

“Power seeks weapons of argument.
It is up to some of us to produce
the argumentative weapons
that those with power seek.
The only question is the purpose
for which power is sought.
And the only moral purpose
Of power is to deny its use,
and thereby to force all into the market
Where the only power is choice of cooperation.”

( .. )

Provide a general understanding

Repair a catastrophic error….

prevent another dark age ….

restore the evolutionary trajectory of western civilization.

A set of reforms

An end to the war of civilizations

What Is The Promise?

The Fifth Enlightenment

The impact of Propertarianism’s Algorithmic Natural Law of Reciprocity and Testimonialism’s Warranty of Due Diligence of Truthfulness will be as great an improvement in mankind’s agency as was (1) Meritocratic Aristocracy, (2) Aristotelian Reason, (3) Enlightenment Empiricism, and the (4) scientific and industrial revolution – and the consequences for mankind profound, enriching, empowering and most of all, transcendent.

( … )

The Promise: The P-Program is An Evolutionary Leap (Duplicate)

The P-Program is to the social sciences of psychology, sociology, cooperation, group strategy, politics, economics, law, and decidability (science) as:

-As Aristotle and Epicurus were to Plato and Socrates
-As Geometry was to Arithmetic
-As Darwin was to Biology
-As Menger was to Economics
-And as Nietzsche was to the European Aesthetic Restoration

The P-Program completes the failed revolution in the behavioral sciences (individual psychological, group social) prevented by the pseudoscientific revolutions against the Anglo-Italian restoration of Classical and Ancestral European thought and civilization. In particular against the Darwinian era’s explanation for the disproportionate rate of evolution of western civilization in the bronze, iron, and modern(steel) ages.

P-Law combines multiple fields but for most it will appear as a combination of the foundations of math, programmatic logic, cognitive science, economics, and law.

It’s Novel But It’s Not Hard

–“P-law has the effect of being so intellectually inaccessible and dense initially that it discourages a person from trying; then when you learn it, you mysteriously perceive it as almost too simple to believe. Yet, you still understand it’s complex. … That’s been my experience.”- T. Q.

You should treat this section of the P-method like learning to diagram sentences, but having to fill in what’s missing, and correcting term use.

You don’t have to speak in P-Logic/P-Law. You just use it for analysis like any other logic.

It is like many other subjects in that it appears complex upfront because you are used to depending on intuition. So it’s harder than say math or programming. Because you are unaware of how much you think you’re reasoning, vs how much you’re just intuiting.

But the vocabulary is smaller than it appears at first, and the general concepts are fairly simple. Like arithmetic, there are a small number of basic rules. Applying them simply requires repetition.

It takes quite smart people (high IQ) at least six months.

You can benefit from the general findings of it even if you never reach the point where you can write law or proofs in it. (some people just deal with HTML, and some people write systems programs)

It Will Surprise You

You will discover that almost all of us are ‘bots’s running on a very simple operating system, very buggy software, with a very complex user interface.

Your first reaction will be to have greater empathy for those who are running buggy software (bad ideas). The world will make sense. Always.

If you are lucky, you will discover how to achieve full ‘consciousness’ (free will) – with deliberate control over your intuitions and choices. And to do so without denying reality, or struggling to find others with which to social construct the illusion of an alternate reality.

The challege is caused by ‘feels vs reals’: The ‘feels’ side of the spectrum must feel it before they can understand it. The “reals’ side of the spectrum must understand it before they can feel it. It’s a journey for both sides of the spectrum.

Knowledge is Not Change, Only Potential For It

No parasite has every been convinced to give up parasitism upon a host.

Every increase (by law) in the suppression of parasitism (Irreciprocity) has been resisted by the practitioners, for whom productive work is less desirable and profitable than crime.

Some criminal organizations evolve into institutions, and some institutions evolve in to criminal organizations, and the argument is that any and all organizations of scale will eventually turn into criminal organizations in one way or another.

So while much scientific falsification of ignorance, error, bias, deceit, fraud – and organized crime – is always met with resistance. The greatest resistance we meet is from people, groups, classes, cultures, and indeed, entire civilizations that operate as organized crime. (think the catholic church in the past, and the university that replaced it today, and the government agencies that are operating in their interests given the past century not our interests given this century.)