The Choice – Episode 0026 – The Prosecution. The Explanation of Abrahamism and The Abrahamic Method of Warfare Against Civilization Nature and Evolution.

The Choice – Episode 0026 – The Prosecution. The Explanation of Abrahamism and The Abrahamic Method of Warfare Against Civilization, Nature, and Evolution.

The Culture of War  – A Product of Group Strategy

Rock Paper Scissors of Civlizational Differences in war:  Endure (India), Trade (europe), Conquest (China), Undermining (Semitia) … Notice I rely on ternary logic at all times, whether it be undecidable, truth candidate, or false, the three 

LAW OF WAR: “You must fight wars on your terms, not the enemy’s but you must defeat the enemy on his terms not yours.”

The Laws of Nature, and the Natural Law and the Organized application of science, law, and violence to force correspondence with them, in order to complete the transformation of man in to the immortal gods mastering nature that he imagined.

The Problem of Group Cohesion: familial, social, economic, political, and military order.

( … )


The Jewish Group Strategy


The Semitic group strategy shares the preservation of family and tribe against the empires and aristocracy. But to decompose it we must be divided into the Muslim and the Jewish, with the Christian a distant relation.

The Jewish Strategy is the Female Strategy

Evolutionary Origins In Differences Between Females and Males In Conflict Strategy (War) 
Evolution provided women with verbal means of warfare just like it provided men with physical means of warfare. And in all statistics both criminal and mental illness, and in all forms of political speech, and even in all forms of argument and discourse, men bias to truth and falsehood under physical threat, and women bias to approval and disapproval under threat of undermining.

Men are Political and Military super predators but Women are Social and Political super predators. This is the reason for women’s disenfranchisement from political participation in history, and the reason for women’s historical reputation as the root of all evil “discord”.  Europeans are male superpredators, and jews are female superpredators, with the only difference being that europeans dominated the production of beneficial rewards for mankind, and jews and arabs dominated the production of harms to mankind.

Now let’s try to work through a few more definitions.

  • Female Strategy:
    • Natural Laws: Supremacy,
      Others: Parasitism – particularly on commons
      Organizing: Undermining,
      Myth: Deceit (Fictional History)
      Negotiation: Deception (Baiting Into Hazard)
      Grammar: Inflationary (Fictionalisms)
    • Victory Conditions: Destroy Enemies Completely
    • For the same reasons females feel they are superior to males, Jews feel they are superior to indo europeans.

The Abrahamic < Jewish < Semitic < Cognitively-Female technique of undermining host civilizations, nations, groups, hierarchies, families, and individuals. Seduction by false promise of freedom from truth, duty, reciprocity, productivity, and the laws of nature, into hazard and harm, for pro?ting by parasitic extraction.

Evolution provided women with verbal means of warfare just like it provided men with physical means of warfare. And in all statistics both criminal and mental illness, and in all forms of political speech, and even in all forms of argument and discourse, men bias to truth and falsehood under physical threat, and women bias to approval and disapproval under threat of undermining.

Men are Political and Military super predators but Women are Social and Political super predators. This is the reason for women’s disenfranchisement from political participation in history, and the reason for women‘s historical reputation as the root of all evil “discord”.

Europeans are productive male superpredators, and Jews are parasitic female superpredators, with the only difference being that Europeans dominated the production of bene?cial rewards for mankind, and jews and Arabs dominated the production of harms to mankind.

Abrahamism is the same technique used to bring about the ?rst Semitic Dark Age — this time of Pseudoscience (including economic innumeracy) and Sophism in the forms of Jewish Marxism to instigate con?cit between the classes, Jewish Postmodernism cause con?ict by undermining conformity to high trust norms, Jewish Denialism that we call Political Correctness to deny the truth, all under the false promise that equality — ever desirous of the female given her demand for consumption — is possible. When the entire point of Jewish cosmopolitan universalism in this age, like Jewish supernatural

The Abrahamic Method of Warfare

Abrahamism includes:

Judaism -> Undermining, Christianity-> Submitting, Islam -> Conquering

… because analysis of any SINGLE sub-religion obscures the function of the group of abrahamic religions as a force of destruction.

Judaism to undermine, Christianity to weaken, and Islam to destroy.

Because those are the three stages of Abrahamism’s method of conquest of the aristocratic peoples by conversion and conquest of women and underclasses (those yet not ‘domesticated into agency’).

  1. Stage 1 – Small external population (vanguard) undermines the main by straw man criticism and ridicule of the organization and its categories relations and values The purpose of Judaism is subjugation (submission). (Judaism – GOSSIP: Reputation Destruction)
  2. Stage 2 – The population is undermined into submission by sale of a false promise – the verbal equivalent of a physical drug. The purpose of Christianity is subjugation (submission). (Christianity – FRAUD: Selling a false promise ).
  3. Stage 3 – The major external population conquers the submitted through raiding the trade routes, immigration, conversion, and conquest and population replacement. The purpose of Islam is subjugation (submission). (Islam – FORCE).

The consequence is the reversal of civilization of the hierarchical pack and the restoration of primitivism of the equalitarian herd. Producing a genetic, cultural, and institutional race to the bottom.

Abrahamic grammars of pilpul and critique are simply well-constructed lies that through repeated use produce an addiction response, the same way that membership in (submission to) the pack or tribe produces an addiction response.

Women are the most vulnerable because they evolved to be irrationally dependent upon the ‘cover’ of the herd. The underclass as well. the less capable classes out of utility. The middle class out of profit from it, and the upper class replaced by a priesthood (frauds) rather than a military (science).

It Is a Very Simple Process Once Understood. Evil as hell. But brilliant.


Total War: 

( … )

Destroy The Enemy Completely


For the moment I’ll address the Jewish strategy, and describe the Muslim in a later article.

(a) Preservation of separatism (non-integration) (Tribalism)
(b) Evasion of payment for the cost of the commons (manners, ethics, morals, traditions, institutions, common property) (Free Riding);
(c) Evasion of production or productivity, and therefore contribution to the world. (free riding)
(c) Preference for Parasitism: Pro?t from baiting into hazard (usury, alcohol, prostitution, slave trading, gambling, organized crime); (Parasitism)
(d) Pro?ting from (Undermining)
(e) Specializing in use of the state against the people (tax collection, money changing)(Corruption)
(f) Investing assets from these criminal activities into rent-seeking (non productive parasitic returns) (Rent Seeking);
(g) Undermining Moral and Ethical Markets and Trade: Slowly migrating capital into mixed criminal, black market, grey market, and open market industries (Undermining Markets)
(h) Undermining the information system (Propaganda)
(i) Undermining the state, the law, their knowledge, their traditions, their culture, the institutions, and their norms in order to convert the state from suppression of local rents to maximization of rents (Undermining Political Cohesion).


Producing Jewish Goals Consisting of: 

    1. To specialize in free riding or rent-seeking (avoid production, concentrate extracted capital)
    2. Concentrate capital in nepotistic networks (concentration of forces)
    3. Use all of the above to create a parasitic ‘priesthood’ cast producing nothing other than a continuous system of propaganda and deceit to maintain a slave underclass with nothing but false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe – a promise that can never be fulfilled, but for which they can infinitely claim they are pursuing.
    4. Utter destruction – like the female, utter destruction. Of information, norms, tradition, values
    5. Prevent adaptation, innovation, and evolution so that parasitic extraction can be maintained by approval-disapproval, undermining-heaping of udue praise, and – this is the strategy fo the unregulated female to her children rather than producing generations capable of independent adaptation, innovation, and evolution of self economy, society, polity, knowledge and mankind.









Parasitic Survival and Reproduction

( … )  Most similar to the opposite end of the spectrm gypsies. Islam is the ultimate form. Christianity was domesticatd by the german aristocracy and prevented full harm until this century when it’s semitic and communist origins as a war gainst evolution of man have been exposed as they revert to type.


Creating a non-producing, parasitic priesthood using sophistry, pseudoscience, or supernaturalism, to create ideological, pseudoscientific, or religious cults

“Total War by Delay, Deceive, Undermine, Sow Discord, and destroy genetic,  normative, cultural, institutional cooperative capital, by disinformation, deceit, defamation, sedition, and treason, under cover of Delay and Decieve by Pretense of Innnocence, using Faith Healing, False Storytelling, Baiting Into Hazard, by False Promise of freedom from constraints of formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary law, Advocated by  sophistry or pseudoscience of Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty, by Pretense of Plausible Deniability, Despite Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the dependence on instincts, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s) – And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (pro?t), Influence(power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Con?ict, Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker, cumulatively producing a dysgenic, devolutionary, dark age.”



The Jewish Methodology: Delay and Deceive: The Jewish Strategy of Incremental Undermining by Delay and Deceive: Where the Chinese rely on their cultural institution of the ancient method of “Accumulate Forces by Delay and Deceive from Without” the Jewish Left equally relies on their cultural and religious institution of the ancient female method of  “Undermine Forces by Delay and Deceive From Within.” 

The Four Big Jewish Lies: There are four sciences: The formal or logical, the physical or material, the natural or behavioral, and the evolutionary or survival. The Jewish Left has produced a set of lies that undermine ‘sensemaking’ by undermining each of these laws.

    1. False Promise of Freedom from Formal Laws (logic) by the use of social construction of repetitive feedback of information counter to formal, physical, natural, and evolutionary laws.
    2. False Promise of Freedom from Physical Laws (scarcity, false promise of endless growth). by the false promise of endless growth, an end to scarcity, and an end to human competition by demonstrated acquisition.
    3. False Promise of Freedom Natural Laws (of self-interest, rational choice, amorality, reciprocity, competitive organization), by the false promise of an end to kin selection, koinophillia, ethnocentrism, sex, class, subrace, and racial differences, and the sexual, social, economic, and political value of organization by ethnocentrism given the class, subrace, and subrace differences in sexual, social, economic, and political value to one another, given the substantial evolutionary difference between the races and subraces.
    4. False Promise of Freedom from Evolutionary Laws ( ending natural, and market selection, accumulating mutation and regulation, the impossibility of isolation, inescapable regression, accumulated genetic load, dysgenia, and the red queen of resources, competitors, biological, climatological, geological, solar, and galactic risks. ).

Four Tactics of Jewish Method of Lying:

    1. Faith Healing, delaying into hazard. Faith Healing consists of providing temporary psychological relief while allowing the cause to persist, grow, and evolve.
    2. False Story Telling, baiting you into empathy, loading, framing, obscurantism, suggestion, suspension of disbelief and overloading.
    3. False Promise, baiting into hazard. Baiting into hazard consists of making false promises of freedom from the laws of the universe. arguing them with sophistry to idealism, magic to pseudoscience, or occult to theology.
    4. False Criticism, undermining into hazard. 
    5. Fomenting Rebellion
    6. Generating Demand for Authority.

What is Abrahamism? Their Method of Argument, persuasion, avocacy and propaganda.

In our Glossary of Natural Law “Abrahamism” refers to the argumentative technique of using Pilpul (via-positiva), and Critique (via-negativa) to construct sophisms (the argumentative equivalent of numerology and astrology) via use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscurantism, overloading, the Fictionalisms, appeals to reasonableness, and false promise, to create hazards.

All three Abrahamic Religions, Kantian philosophy, Marxist argument, and Postmodern thought all make use of this technique of argument, often stated as “Dialectic” but operationally consisting of Social Construction via Overloading of human reason with False Promise advanced by Pilpul (sophistry) and defended by Critique (undermining and disapproval rather than falsification).

Most of Propertarianism (the Natural Law of Reciprocity, The Law of Testimony) consists of attempts to prevent Abrahamic arguments and replace them with Testimonial (Ratio-Scientific-and-Operational) arguments so that Law (Constitutions) can be constructed strictly and logically and is not open to accidental, intentional, misinterpretation. Thus requiring legislatures reform a law rather than allow legislation from the Jurist’s bench – which is the means by which the US Constitution was undermined.

Propertarianism includes Testimonialism, the purpose of which is the suppression of deception and parasitism by rhetorical means.

Abrahamism: consists of Baiting into Hazard, False Promise, Pilpul (positive), Critique (negative), straw manning, and heaping of undue praise, and propagation into social construction, to force you by overloading to appeal to your intuition rather than reason and evidence.

Common Properties of Abrahamism

  • 1) Restatement of Myth as History
  • 2) Projection of Traditional Wisdom as Authoritarian Law
  • 3) Dependence upon Supernaturalism (“Magic”, “Miracle”)
  • 4) Monopoly (exclusivity) and threat of loss for non compliance.
    • a) Authoritarian (blind to questioning)
    • b) Demand for Aubmission (blind to innovation)
    • c) Intolerance for Change or adaptation (blind dedication)
    • d) Blindness to negative Results or Evidence, Overstatement of Positive results (blind faith)
  • 5) False Promise of Impossible (supernatural, natural) Reward for Compliance.
  • 6) Use of Pilpul and Critique In Defense of the falsehoods.
  • 7) Castes of Priests with status, power, and economic incentives to perpetuate the falsehoods.
  • 8) Secret Knowledge, or Prohibition on Competing Knowledge, or Denial of contradictory knowledge.
  • 9) Costs of Entry:
    • Oath to a falsehood. (prayer)
    • Payment of Ritualistic costs to the falsehood. (rituals)
    • Payment of ‘donations’ (fees) to the priesthood (tithes)


Common Tactics in Abrahamism

Civilizational Destruction from Within;
Instigating Construction of Internal Spirals of Capital Rivalry, Consumption, Destruction;
By Baiting into Hazard (certain risk);
Those who are ignorant, or lack agency;
By use of False Promise (circumvention of reality);
Under the persuasion by Sophism (pilpul);
Justified by Critique (lie, criticism, straw—manning)
Under the cover of Moral Pretense (lie);
Under the cover of Plausible Deniability (lie);
For the purpose of profiting (by harm)
From the consumption of accumulated capital (undermining): truth, reason, delay of gratification, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, cooperation between classes, organization of the classes,
By not specializing in,
… The production of innovation in goods services information, both private and common
Where one’s display word and deed is Warrantied
And instead by specialization in fields permitting Export of Risk And Absent Warranty
… Gossip for Undermining (Entertainment, Media, News, Opinion)
… Informational Destruction (Academy)
… Government (Facilitation of Conflict)
… Legislation
… … (Undermining by,
… … … Facilitation of Conflict,
… … … Facilitating Dissolution of norms, traditions, manners, ethics morals,
… … … Facilitation of Parasitism, Capital exhaustion)
… Rent—Seeking (special interests)
… Corruption (influence)
… Undermining the law (specialization in undermining the constitution via the courts)
… Law (specialization in coercion)
… Finance (Parasitism and entrapment)
… Tax and accounting (evasion)
… Marketing and Advertising (scams and undermining)
… Sales Scams
… Commercial Trade in Scams physical, service, and informational
… Black Market Goods, services, and Information.
… Check Cashing
… Loan Sharking
… Gambling
… Pornography
… Prostitution
… Drug Dealing
… creating conflict,
… destroying trust,
… generating demand for restitution
… generating demand for authority,
And authority that recursively issues another iteration of
… false promise,
… baiting into hazard
Causing a Continuous Conflict Spiral
And Tragedy of the Commons (Conflict for consumption)
until all accumulated assets, including:
… genetic,
… cultural,
… normative,
… artistic,
… economic,
… institutional and
… political;
have been consumed;
by the conflict between classes and interests;
and by the expansion of the underclasses;
whose numbers, invasion, reproduction, consumption, agitation, had been previously limited by;
… productivity, property, market, law, and natural aristocracy;
… And the surplus proceeds from production devoted to the production of commons;
… Providing the asymmetric returns on those commons.

Where Abrahamic Argument (noun) Consists of:

  1. Stating or Implying a False Promise, (of escape from physical, natural, and evolutionary laws)
  2. Without provision of Warranty, (skin in the game)
  3. For the purpose of Baiting into Moral Hazard, (failure)
  4. Where one can profit from others’ loss, by 
    1. Murder,
    2. Violence,
    3. Theft,
    4. Fraud,
    5. Free Riding,
    6. Socialization of Losses,
    7. Privatization of The Commons,
    8. Conspiracy,
    9. Statism,
    10. Conversion,
    11. Immigration,
    12. Conquest
  5. Persuaded or Argued by “Pilpul” consisting of the
    1. Sophisms of:
      1. Loading,
      2. Framing,
      3. Suggestion,
      4. Conflation (!!)
      5. False Dichotomy
      6. False Equivalency
      7. Double Standards
      8. Cherry Picking
      9. Obscurantism,
      10. Overloading,
    2. and the Fictionslisms of:
      1. Innumeracy
      2. Idealism,
      3. Pseudoscience
      4. “Magic” 
      5. Supernaturalism, and
      6. Deceit,
  6. Appealing to:
    1. NAXALT (‘not all x are like that’)
    2. Optimisms or Pessimisms as Medians (outliers)
    3. Reasonableness (limiting to interpersonal)
    4. Morality (limiting to global)
    5. Face (Status, Reputation, Honor)
    6. Norms (what others do)
    7. Authority (scripture, law)
  7. Instead of:
    1. Truth or Falsehood
    2. Rationality vs Irrationality (self interest)
    3. Reciprocity or Irreciprocity
    4. Probability or Improbability
    5. Possibility or Impossibility
  8. And defended by “Critique”, consisting of:
    1. Heaping of Undue Praise on Straw Men (positive)
    2. Criticism by Straw Manning (negative), and
    3. Poisoning the Well (Polluting the Informational Commons)
    4.  and GSRRM (denial, disapproval, ridicule, shaming, reputation destruction), consisting of:
      1. denial
      2. disapproval,
      3. shaming
        1. outraging
        2. ridicule,
        3. shaming,
        4. moralizing,
        5. psychologizing,
      4. reputation Destruction
        1. rallying,
        2. gossiping,
        3. and reputation destruction –
  9. Demonstrating
    1. deceit,
    2. distraction, and
    3. disapproval
  10. Instead of:
    1. True of False argument,
    2. Or Fully Informed Agreement or Disagreement
  11. Thereby
    1. Advancing a falsehood on one hand, and
    2. Attacking the person rather than argument on the other.
  12. In order to obscure:
    1. lying,
    2. cheating,
    3. stealing, to directly lie, cheat, steal, or
    4. baiting into hazards from which they can
      1. lie cheat and steal under cover of
        1. ambiguity and
        2. pretense of ignorance, and
        3. pretense of innocence for the harm done.
  13. Includes:
    1. Ridicule, Shaming, Moralizing, Psychologizing, Gossiping, Rallying,
    2. Sophism, Pilpul, Critique, Pseudoscience, Supernaturalism,
    3. Relativism, Straw-Manning, Misrepresentation, Cherry-Picking, Double-Standards, Half-Truth, False Equivalency,
    4. False And Impossible Promise, Framing Moral Pretense, Baiting Into Hazard, Evasion From Warranty, Pro?ting From Resulting Hardship,
    5. Nepotism, Privatization Of The Commons, Socialization Of Losses, Conspiracy, Organized-Crime, Rent-Seeking, Procedural-Abuse, False Accusation, Institutional Overloading, Intellectual Dishonesty, Coercion,
    6. Endemic Lying, Shouting Down, Propagandizing, Poisoning The Discourse, Polluting The Informational Commons, Traitorousness, And Personal, Social, Political, Cultural, Religious, Aesthetic, Legal, Constitutional, And Institutional Undermining,
    7. Thanklessness, Evading Introspection, Blame-Shifting, Avoidance Of Responsibility, And Cowering Under Plausible Deniability In Order To Avoid Any Semblance Of Truth, Reciprocity, Productivity, Duty, And Contribution To The Commons.
    8. And scaling from the individual to the polity to the society to the civilization by Social Construction using:
    1. Gossiping
    2. Biased Reporting
    3. Disinformation
    4. Propaganda
    5. Pseudo-Academic Publication
    6. Entertainment

Exploring The Specific Tactics

Now, notice how simple the truth is, and how complex the lies are.

Baiting Into Hazard (Seduction, Entrapment)

“Using False Promise, Baiting Into Hazard, Advocated by Pilpul, Defended by Critique, Escaping Liability and Warranty, by Pretense of Plausible Deniability, Despite Deliberate Avoidance of Due Diligence, And Deliberate Evasion of Warranty, Deliberate Escape From Liability, Given the Asymmetry of Knowledge, the Presence of Malincentives by both Agent(s) and Victim(s) – And Pursued for the Purpose of Attention, Reward (pro?t), Influence(power), Undermining (Power), of the Trust and Cooperation, of a Population in Normal Distribution, Thereby Generating accelerating Cycles of Internal Con?ict, Generating Demand for Authority to Control by the Hazard Maker.”

That paragraph may require multiple reads, so that you follow the full sequence. It explains the genetic con?ict strategy of females who must manage children by half-truths, compete and cooperate with other women by half-truths, and in?uence or undermine the dominance hierarchy of men with half-truths, using the suite of disapproval, ridicule, shaming, scolding, psychologizing, moralizing, gossiping, rallying, and if necessary psychotic episodes (female version of anti-social behavior) to obtain her interests — because she cannot otherwise compete by production, trade, knowledge, argument, or violence.

Defining a Hazard

  • In old English law. An unlawful game at dice, those who play at it being called ‘hazardors’. In modern law. Any game of chance or wagering.
  • In insurance law. The risk, danger, or probability that the event Insured against may happen, varying with the circumstances of the particular case.
  • Moral hazard. In fire insurance. The risk or danger of the destruction of the insured property by fire, as measured by the character and interest of the insured owner, his habits as a prudent and careful man or the reverse, his known integrity or his bad reputation, and the amount of loss he would suffer by the destruction of the property or the gain he would make by suffering it to burn and collecting the insurance.
  • Moral Hazard In lack of incentive to guard against risk where one is protected from its consequences, lack of incentive to guard against risk where one is protected from its consequences
  • In economics, moral hazard occurs when an entity has an incentive to increase its exposure to risk because it does not bear the full costs of that risk.
  • “A tiger trap presents a hazard not only to the tiger, but to man.”


1) I lend you money at usurious prices that will entrap you.
2) I lend you money or extend you credit to gamble.
3) I lend you money or extend you credit to buy alcohol or drugs.
4) A woman implies access to friendship, affection, or sex, which she will never deliver.
5) I promise you life after death if you obey and undermine the upper classes. (abrahamism)
6) I promise you power and equality if you undermine the political system (marx)
7) I promise you equality if you undermine men (feminism)
8) I promise you status if you undermine the status hierarchy (postmodernism)
9) I appeal to your morality and pass the hart cellar immigration act.

  • If I suggest you might win at gambling (you can’t), that’s baiting you into hazard. If I entice you into buying drugs, i’m baiting you in to a hazard, since addiction is a spiral.
  • If I offer you a loan to get what you want under impulse or duress, but I can extract interest from you, and then seize your property in restitution.
  • If I promise you equality or socialism when it’s genetics that cause our differences, and you act to destroy your civilization, then that’s all baiting into hazard.
  • if I promise you salvation in heaven if you rebel against the government that is trying to create order and prosperity over the next few decades, that is baiting you into a hazard.
  • In other words, you are entering into a voluntary exchange that is not in your interests, simply because for whatever reason you are vulnerable to the trap.
  • These are all lies that bait you into hazard (risk and loss).

( … )

Inalienability means you can’t give up certain rights even ifyou want to, because by doing so you give up obligations to others. This means that the cowardly, weak, unable, and those lacking agency can defect and destroy ‘natural rights under natural law’.


Creating Plausible Deniability:

Hiding Behind Moral Pretense

( … )

Taking Advantage of Self Determination, Free Speech, and Tolerance

( … )

The Technique of Delay by Faith Healing

Faith Healing consists of providing temporary psychological relief while allowing the cause to persist, grow, and evolve.

The Technique of Distraction by False Story Telling

baiting you into empathy, loading, framing, obscurantism, suggestion, suspension of disbelief and overloading.

The Technique of  Dialectic

( … )

The Technique of Pilpul

Their technique of Pilpul: They use an element of truth to create a false dichotomy and therefore frame the question by suggestion, and obscure the solution due to anchoring.

  • We are always vulnerable to anchoring.
  • Because we are vulnerable to anchoring we are vulnerable to framing.
  • Because we are vulnerable to framing we are vulnerable to suggestion and obscurantism.
  • Because we are vulnerable to suggestion and obscurantism we are vulnerable to influence.

If we are provided with an incentive to justify that influence we can be controlled – by Blocking our Opportunity and Motivation for seeking truth.

The three Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) all produce recursive ignorance due to BLOCKING our search for truth.

This is how PILPUL is used to deceive, and why math, logic, science, economics, law and testimonial truth are such an important defense.

A lie (incentive), a half-truth, a False dichotomy (choice).

Low trust people simply don’t go beyond the tangible. High trust people do. Our asset of high trust in constructing the commons which produce such outsized returns compared to other peoples. But our trust( suspension of disbelief), and vulnerability to anchoring, suggestion, and obscurantism make our ordinary folk easily deceived, manipulated, controlled, and preyed upon.

Now, with that understanding, let’s define the properties of Critique.

The Technique of Critique

  • Opportunity to obtain an unearned discount by avoiding a cost, causing others to bear a cost, lie, cheat, steal, undermine, or defeat.
  • Decidability – in the choice between the via positiva: self sufficiency, reciprocity, and via-negativa: parasitism, and cheating a preference for
  • Criticism of the status quo, current leadership, current plan, current strategy, norms, traditions, institutions.
  • Conflation of Approval, Preference, and Desirability with Truth, Necessity, and Possibility.
  • Indirection
  • Incrementalism
  • Avoidance
  • Special Pleading, Irreciprocal or Polylogical Ethics, False Moral Equivalence
  • Liability warranty
  • Plausible Deniability
  • Feminine demand from Males to insulate females, the young, and the old, and the weak from physical, natural, evolutionary, laws of the universe, by social construction of instability that threatens the dominant males.
  • Victimhood, Victime Narrative, Oppression Narratives
  • Anthropomorpization: Blaming the dominance hierarchy as a proxy for the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws. (Blaming the police so to speak).


The Technique of Evading Providing A Competitive Solution

  • Absence of Solution, Statement of Demand, because stating the demand would cause retaliation, or be otherwise untenable.  Why? Because solutions or alternatives are open to equal rational criticism. Instead, absence of a solution, substituting criticism causes the opposition to defend against ideal demands rather than comparative trade-offs. The appropriate counter is to ask for an equally articulate plan, how to bring it into being, and what the consequences would be.

The Technique of Selling Fraud to Undermine

  • Selling Cope via Hope as a Delaying (Undermining) Technique.
  • False Promise: Freedom from the conformity to the ‘oppression of physical, natural, and evolutionary laws’. Freedom from scarcity, freedom from reciprocity, freedom from suppression of dysgenia.
  • Selling Frauding: Advanced by Pilpul: using the three possible means of human defrauding: Physical: magic > pseudoscience, verbal: sophistry > idealism, or imaginary(emotional): supernatural > occult.

The Technique or Gossiping Shaming Ridiculing Rallying and Moralizing

  • Undermining (blaming) by GSRRM: Disapproving > Denying, Shaming > Gossiping, Outraging > Rallying, Psychologizing > Moralizing, Dominating > Oppressing, Reputation-Destruction > Propagandizing (Limiting consumption)

The Technique of “GSRRM” or ORRGS includes

… (S)haming,

… … (M)oralizing,
… … … (P)sychologizing,
… … … … (R)idiculing
… … … … … (R)allying
… … … … … … (G)ossiping
… … … … … … … (P)ropagandizing
… … … … … … … … (U)ndermining,
… … … … … … … … … (R)eputation destruction.
… … and solving for…
… … … … … … … … … … (F)ace, approval, or consent – instead of truth.

In western history GSRM was largely illegal or punishable by direct violence between men. And laws against “scolds” -women’s gossiping and undermining – were enforced to keep the peace. During the democratic and Marxist and postmodern movements as women demanded political power, they undermined these laws of the duel, libel, slander, and scolding, under the pretense of free speech – rather than free truthful factual speech (testimony). Marxism, Postmodernism, and feminism consist largely of sophism pseudoscience and denialism defended by GSRM.

GSRM, like outright denial, is one of the means of dishonesty that avoids argument, whereas dishonestly constructing argumentative deception is done by Loading Framing Obscuring Cherry Picking, Fictionalizing, Sophisms, and the Fictionalisms of idealism, supernaturalism, and pseudoscience.

  • Overloading: by use of Dialectic(using narration, suggestion, suspension of disbelief, recursive undermining, for recursive suggestion, recursively reducing resistance to skepticism, and providing reinforcement by appeal to instinct.)
  • Straw Manning – painting a false or cherry-picked set of claims to undermine. My pet peeve is economists who ignore losses in civilizational, Institutional, cultural, normative, informational, cognitive, and human, capital.
  • Personalizing an idea, and attacking the person, versus heaping of undue praise to exaggerate a  person. —“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.”– Saul Alinsky
  • Environmental Overloading (propaganda) –
  • Social Construction of Threats: by use of continuous gossiping about the subject at every opportunity so that those who are less able and informed are convinced by environmental saturation (Norm).

The Technique of Evading Truthful Reciprocal Argument

( … )

The Left “debate” Strategy Isn’t to Debate – It’s to Undermine: Devolve.

Duplicity, ir-reciprocity, honor-in-deceit, profiting from inciting and exploitation of moral hazard, false promise, justificationary sophism (Pilpul), straw man sophism (Critique), and disapproval, shaming, rallying, moralizing as substitute for argument is a cultural strategy.

The Abrahamists institutionalized this method of ‘resistance’ to the Masculine(Aryan) method: reciprocity, honor in truth duty and sacrifice, suppression of moral hazard, limiting promises to the truthful and possible, using falsification (rather than justification), sticking to the central argument, and avoiding disapproval, shaming, rallying, and moralizing – and constraining to costs and benefits.

Consumption(Leftists) = female reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure:”The Herd”. It uses threat of ostracization from the Herd by disapproval, ridicule,shaming, gossip, moralizing, rallying – and not argument. I listed the steps in the technique.

Capitalization(Rightists) = Male reproductive strategy, associated cognitive biases, and associated brain structure: “The Pack”.

The left (feminine cognitive bias) lacks Agency. The right possesses agency.

It’s that simple.

The Technique of Destroying Information, Education, and Knowledge


We tend to look at the demonstrated verbal superiority of the Ashkenazi, their long history of literacy, writing, law, hermeneutic interpretation, persuasion, and consequent success in occupations that require a combination of the estimation of others ability, the accumulation of textual information, and the exercise of persuasion (or coercion).

But we forget that their group success is dependent almost entirely on eugenic reproduction, in which the community contributes money to the Professor (Rabbi)so that he may bear extra children, and that the community outcasts members who cannot perform to standard, and reduces the rates of reproduction through poverty of those that cannot perform to standard. So just as the european nobility redistributed to the middle and upper classes, the production of the underclasses, the Ashkenazi, redistributed the production of the host peoples to their upper genetic classes. And both the Ashkenazi and Europeans then specialized in self-transcendence by (beneficial) suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses, and the redirection of energies to the upper classes.

However, let’s have a look at what Europeans (Aryans) achieved when they were literate, and what the Ashkenazi (and jews) accomplished when they were literate. Or let’s ask it differently: what did Aryans and Jews accomplish when they practiced Abrahamism, versus before adoption and after departure from Abrahamism.

Or put another way, what have the Aryans and Jews accomplished under Aristotelianism (European Aryanism), versus what have they achieved under Abrahamism.

Moreover, what had the north Africans, the Levantines, the Byzantines, and the Persians accomplished before Abrahamism? What did they accomplish under the long term effects of Abrahamism?

Let’s bring in the Indians. What did the Dravidians (Hrappans) achieve before Supernatural Aryanism. What did they achieve after Supernatural Aryanism? What have they achieved since the introduction of Aristotelian Aryanism?

What did the Chinese achieve having never encountered Supernatural Aryanism, or Jewish Abrahamism?

What occurred when the Chinese resisted Aristotelian Aryanism? What occurred now that the Chinese finally adopted Aristotelian Aryanism?

Jews accomplished literally nothing despite being the most literate people in Europe. Islamists accomplished nothing except the selective import of classical, Persian, and Indian thought, and upon consumption of those parts of those civilizations that they could consume, declined rapidly into even lower trust, even greater ignorance after 1200, even while invading Europe for centuries to come, and spreading Islamic ignorance from which Spain and the southeast of Europe seem challenged to recover from due to both cultural and genetic devolution.

We tend to make excuses by justifying intentions. But if we look at the historical record, Supernatural Aryanism was used to educate if not subjugate the ignorant, and let to the eradication of the Supernatural (Iranian) Aryans.

There is no greater crime than Abrahamism in human history. There is no greater source of ignorance and deceit than Abrahamism. No greater source of poverty. No more severe limitation to transcendence.

There has been no greater source of murder, death, starvation, than the combination of Third Generation Judaism in the form of Marxism, Socialism and the first Jewish empire: the Soviet Union, and the French reformation of it into Postmodernism and the necessary reactions to it including Fascism; Nor and the Second Generation of Arab Abrahamism(Islam), in which the tactics of Arab expansion of Arabic Abrahamism (Islam) which relies on intellectual seduction of the underclasses and women, raiding of capital and trade, and decentralized warfare, to obtain sufficient power to conduct conventional warfare internally and externally, to impose Abrahamic Ignorance upon people, and devolve them into increasingly ignorant, and unintelligent peoples.
Just as freedom of speech must end, and be replaced by freedom of truthful speech. Freedom of religion must end, and be replaced by freedom of truthful religion.

That is the lesson of history.

( … )

The Technique of Scaling Critique to the Political


The Female Method of Warfare:

  • Reputation Destruction,
  • Alliance Destruction,
  • Trust Destruction,
  • Social Destruction.

RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.”

Power is derived from 2 main sources â?? money and people. â??Have-Notsâ? must build power from flesh and blood. (These are two things of which there is a plentiful supply. Government and corporations always have a difficult time appealing to people, and usually do so almost exclusively with economic arguments.)

The only material power is violence. Everything else is tolerance by the powerful. If you cannot use violence you are not in fact powerful. If you can use violence and you do not then you are unworthy of rule, and merely free riding, parasitizing, or conspiring. What does this teach you? Master Organized Violence. Use it with Zero Tolerance.

RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.”

It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. (Organizations under attack wonder why radicals donâ??t address the â??realâ? issues. This is why. They avoid things with which they have no knowledge.)

Straw manning is only effective if we are tolerant of straw manning, and avoiding the central issues at hand. The only reason not to engage in war, decimation, enslavement, and enserfment of the various type available, is truthful, productive, discourse on the central issues. If we cannot discourse on issues then we either war if we can, or are destroyed if we cannot. Ergo, the only power is Violence.

RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.”

Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

Again, straw manning is effective in particular because those who specialize in truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity, voluntary exchange under the natural law, and markets in all aspects of life, develop specialization and habituation of doing so. Sun Tzu, Machiavelli, Nietzsche (and me for that matter), and The Great Generals, are not telling us how to fight war. They are telling us that we must not be ‘christianized’ by our own moral rule. This is one of the secrets to the west’s success outside of the abrahamic dark age: rule by warriors ensures we are not victims of ingroup morality extended to outgroup conflict. It is also one of the reasons for the success of islam: it is a continuous call to war against aristocracy, by every living soul, to reverse aristocracy and restore dysgenic pastoralism.

RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”

If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entityâ??s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)

Critique is a powerful means of avoiding the act of providing a solution that ‘in total’ is more

(need to understand how they seek reciprocity)

RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”

There is no defense. Itâ??s irrational. Itâ??s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)

Ridicule is not discussion, debate, or argument… it is admission one lacks one, and as such breaks the incentive for non violence necessary to negotiate. Therefore all cases of ridicule that are tolerated are nothing more than you avoiding the cost of policing the commons against those who would undermine, free ride, parasite, and predate.

RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”

They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. Theyâ??re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid â??un-funâ? activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)

Tolerating small wins by the enemy only gives them positive reinforcement. If you are practicing truth, duty, sovereignty, reciprocity, natural law, and markets in everything the only objective people can have is falsehood and duty(debt) avoidance, reciprocity and non-sovereignty, arbitrary rule, and free riding, parasitism and predation, and in such cases they are almost always unwilling to trade improvement in their behavior for commons and consumption that results from their improved behavior.

RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.”

Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)

CD: …

RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.”

Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)

CD …

RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activistsâ?? minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)

CD …

RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.”

Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred managementâ??s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

CD …

RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”

Never let the enemy score points because youâ??re caught without a solution to the problem. (Old saw: If youâ??re not part of the solution, youâ??re part of the problem. Activist organizations have an agenda, and their strategy is to hold a place at the table, to be given a forum to wield their power. So, they have to have a compromise solution.)

CD …

RULE 12: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.”

Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

CD: …

The Technique of Scaling Violence

( … Bolsheviks, ANtifa, BLM, Communists … now islamists … )

The Technique of Scaling Numbers

(false promise, conversion, immigration, daspora)

The Technique of Legalism – Exploiting Legal Weakness

The Technique of Generating Demand For Authoritarian Government

The Technique of Alliance with The State Against The People

Scaling Critique to Institutions


1. Abolition of private property in land and application of all rents of land to public purpose.

The courts have interpreted the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868) to give the government far more “eminent domain” power than was originally intended, Under the rubric of “eminent domain” and various zoning regulations, land use regulations by the Bureau of Land Management property taxes, and “environmental” excuses, private property rights have become very diluted and private property in landis, vehicles, and other forms are seized almost every day in this country under the “forfeiture” provisions of the RICO statutes and the so-called War on Drugs..

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.

The 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913 (which some scholars maintain was never properly ratified), and various State income taxes, established this major Marxist coup in the United States many decades ago. These taxes continue to drain the lifeblood out of the American economy and greatly reduce the accumulation of desperately needed capital for future growth, business starts, job creation, and salary increases.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

Another Marxian attack on private property rights is in the form of Federal & State estate taxes and other inheritance taxes, which have abolished or at least greatly diluted the right of private property owners to determine the disposition and distribution of their estates upon their death. Instead, government bureaucrats get their greedy hands involved.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.

We call it government seizures, tax liens, “forfeiture” Public “law” 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of “terrorists” and those who speak out or write against the “government” (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process.

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.

The Federal Reserve System, created by the Federal Reserve Act of Congress in 1913, is indeed such a “national bank” and it politically manipulates interest rates and holds a monopoly on legal counterfeiting in the United States. This is exactly what Marx had in mind and completely fulfills this plank, another major socialist objective. Yet, most Americans naively believe the U.S. of A. is far from a Marxist or socialist nation.

6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the state.

In the U.S., communication and transportation are controlled and regulated by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) established by the Communications Act of 1934 and the Department of Transportation and the Interstate Commerce Commission (established by Congress in 1887), and the Federal Aviation Administration as well as Executive orders 11490, 10999 — not to mention various state bureaucracies and regulations. There is also the federal postal monopoly, AMTRAK and CONRAIL — outright socialist (government-owned) enterprises. Instead of free-market private enterprise in these important industries, these fields in America are semi-cartelized through the government’s regulatory-industrial complex.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of wastelands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.

While the U.S. does not have vast “collective farms” (which failed so miserably in the Soviet Union), we nevertheless do have a significant degree of government involvement in agriculture in the form of price support subsidies and acreage allotments and land-use controls. The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture. As well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Evironmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.

8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.

We call it the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two “income” family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920’s, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000. And I almost forgot…The Equal Rights Amendment means that women should do all work that men do including the military and since passage it would make women subject to the draft.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.

We call it the Planning Reorganization Act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public “law” 89-136.

  1. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc.

People are being taxed to support what we call ‘public’ schools, which train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based “Education” .




History of Abrahamism

Origins of Abrahamism: The Gender Differences in Negotiating

The Genders differ in their competition, conflict and warfare strategy.

Males: Truth under threat of violence in the service of male solidarity in the preservation of the Tribe and Territory is the competitive strategy of males. Males fight for position in the hierarchy and end conflict with increases in loyalty to one another.
— vs —
Females: conformity under threat of reputation destruction in the service of female solidarity independent of Tribe and Territory is the competitive strategy of females. Females fight to destroy or kill without ending.

Abrahamism consists of the continuous advancement of the female means of conflict and war: undermining, deceit, and exhaustive relentless diligence in seizing every opportunity to do so. It is the ‘gatherer’ and ‘herd’ strategy of continuous harm. Men tend not to do this, in-group. Instead men use threats of violence and organized violence.

What I do, what we Propertarians do, is teach how to identify, understand, and defeat these feminine arguments – arguments that because of our high trust genetics, traditions, institutions, and civilization, we are disproportionately vulnerable to.

The Evolution of The Art of Lying:

  • The Female Group Strategy of Undermining
  • Abrahamism v1: Judaism against Babylon’s Aristocracy
  • Abrahamism v2: Christianity against Western Aristocracy.
  • Abrahamism v3: Islam against the ancient world’s Aristocracy
  • Abrahamism v4: Marxism against the modern world’s Aristocracy.
  • Abrahamism v5: French Postmodernism against the current world’s Aristocracy.
  • Abrahamism v6: Islamism against the entire world’s Aristocracy.

This is why the abrahamic (Jewish in particular, or Semitic in general) means of countering Greco-Roman-European argument by using false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul (sophism), and critique (undermining) is so effective: it is how our females talk to us, and because of our high trust, we are either genetically or culturally vulnerable to it – where other lower trust people are not. And we are easily undermined politically and academically because our females naturally find greater ‘affinity’ with Semitic non-argument (religion, postmodernism, feminism, denialism) than with European reason science truth testimony.

  • Male European – Truth over Face, Regardless of cost.
  • Male everywhere else – some degree of face over truth.
  • Female everywhere – nearly universal face over truth.

Yet it is Truth over Face that is the reason for the ‘Western miracle’ – why the rest is so different from the rest.

Hence why Christians are the vulnerability of Western civilization: their religion was developed to obtain the attention of women, and to appeal to GSRM. The religion is stated and argued with false promise(‘salvation’), baiting into hazard (cultural vulnerability to conquest), using pilpul (excuse making) and critique (straw manning), and the fictionalism of supernaturalism.

The Middle East uses the female reproductive strategy and the Far East and the West use the male reproductive strategy, with the Far East using face over truth to defend hierarchy and the West using truth before face to defend the market of the peerage. And the Middle East today just as in the age of the Greeks, just lying and shaming all truth without end.

The world is not complicated. It is our lies that make it seem so.

Abrahamism, Communism, Postmodernism vs Technology, Markets, and Truth.

We see the evolution of law of western peoples:

1 – Sovereignty, (individualism is incorrect).
2 – Tort, and thang, court, senate,
3 – Martial Truth (Military ‘Reporting’), and the demand for speaking martial truth regardless of the consequences to the dominance (competency) hierarchy.
4 – Reason, rationalism, empiricism, and science as a consequence.
5 – Markets and competing intellectual disciplines rather than authority and mono-disciplines (ie: religion).

These choices are the consequences of mixed, metalworking, agrarian, cattle herders, requiring large well defended territories, that must self finance their military capability, because they lack any means of concentrating capital and taxation cheaply as did the irrigationist in the flood river valleys. They developed ‘Contractual Civilization’.

But we also see:

1 – Abrahamic fiction and supernaturalism of the pastoralists against the reason and realism of the agrarians and metallurgists;
2 – Pseudoscientific Communism as a restatement of Jewish separatism using class warfare; and;
3 – Postmodernism as a pseudo-rational restatement of Marxism-communism using ethnic warfare.


1 – Superstition (Judaism, Christianity, Islamism)
…. evolved into ==>
2 – Pseudoscience (w Jewish Critique)
… evolved into ==>
3 – Pseudo rationalism (w Jewish Pilpul) (French > German > Jewish),
… evolved into ==>
4 – Denialism and silencing (w Jewish Bolshevism)
… evolved into ==>
5 – Private Sector Denial an Silencing ( jewish american bolshevism)

Each time increasing in rhetorical complexity but using the same techniques in each of the sophisms:

1 – Justification (Pilpul) and Poisoning the Well by Straw Man (Critique) then adding incremental techniques of:
… a) Fictionalism (Fictional History > Mythology),
… b) Supernaturalism,
… c) Pseudoscience, and;
… d) Pseudo Rationalism, and at present
… e) Simple Denialism. (Race, IQ, Homogeneity, Markets)

It took me less than a year of relatively hard work to disassemble the techniques into grammars and enumerate and articulate all of them. But no matter the depth of analysis, lying by art of suggestion by overloading is still lying by abuse of the human process of continuous recursion in streams of memory producing what we call Meaning, and our suggestibility and suspension of disbelief in that state.

Realism, Reason, Calculation and Computation in all their forms, are defenses against this suggestion, loading, overloading by the use of correspondence and operational possibility, but take disciplined training and a minimum intellectual ability. Because we have a host of cognitive and moral (reproductive) biases that influence our choices without the discipline and training to prevent them from doing so.

The Ancient World civilizations each produced means of producing sufficient meaning (rules) for local preservation of cooperation:
Rome (Realism), Athens (Idealism(abstract)), Anatolian (lost), Babylon (Ideal Monotheism(supernatural)), Jerusalem (Authoritarian Reactionary Monotheism), Beka Valley (Authoritarian Expansionary Monotheism), Memphis (Pragmatic Ritual Polytheism), Indus (Pragmatic Narrative Polytheism), and Yellow River (Confucian Rationalism, hierarchy and harmony), Lao Tsu’s “balance and reasonableness”, and the utility of Buddhism in Ritual. With only the Japanese



The Great Conflict of Human History

The homogeneous masculine eugenic pack of hunters and farmers were able to produce high trust commons, versus the heterogeneous feminine dysgenic universalist herd and herders were unable to produce high trust commons. (Cain and Able is the literary example of the Pastoralists hatred of the wealthier and urbanized Agrarians and Metalworkers).

But the question is not Athens vs Jerusalem, since both ideal democracy and supernatural universalism have been the greatest failures of all of the world civilizations, causing the destruction of every great ancient civilization and bringing about the Abrahamic Dark Age and it’s 750M dead; as well as the current 150 Year attempt at recreating another Abrahamic Dark Age — this time by Rousseau, Kant, Marx, Boas, Freud, Cantor, Adorno and co., and their 100M dead. Followed by the inventiveness of the French and their conspirators: Derrida, Foucault, Rorty et al. And the feminists that followed from them: each trying to produce a monopoly as a means of avoiding markets for cooperation, because they are unable to compete in those markets for pareto optimums, only Nash equilibriums

In the ancient world, overextension of the empires to eliminate local frictions (taxes, rents) on trade, and profit from those efficiencies, produced travel, communication, trade, and infrastructure that made possible the Jewish and Christian invasion of the western empire; intentional fomenting of underclass resistance against the aristocratic civilization; and then Byzantine forcible conversion of the entirety of the population in order to end Reason, Law, and Aristocratic Rule.

The same technique is being used in this current era: invade, rebel, rally underclasses, import underclasses, and then seek power by numbers, using fairy tales desirable by those underclasses using the sophisms those underclasses are defenseless against, and which the Aristocracy tolerates or finds useful until the society has been destroyed by it.


Gobekli Tepe is the oldest Temple complex we find to date, and predates all other monolithic works by thousands of years. It is also just south of one of the world’s greatest hunting gardens teeming with life at the origin of the Euphrates – an Eden if there ever was one.

As far as we know, from there, at the nexus of the continents, near the center of trade between them, on the highways of the main rivers, the idea spread from the monoliths of the Atlantic peoples to the advanced stone of the Egyptians.

It was an early and effective tool of social order. Most likely because it predicted seasons. Once those skills existed, the construction revolution bloomed.

The West that The Rest Rebels Against

While Myth, Ritual, and Oath are necessary components of demand for neural economy (computational efficiency) in the production of rules of social order, how we communicate those rules, the group evolutionary strategies in those rules, and the outcomes that are produced as externality by those rules, are not only means of internal persistence, but external competition. Only one set of those rules produces reciprocally beneficial outcomes:

Western Truth, Duty, Reciprocity, Sovereignty, Reason, Science, Rule of Law, and Competitive Markets in Everything gave the world nearly everything that raised man out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, and the dangers of nature.

Western Civilization consists of The Continuous Calculation by Competitive Trial and Error, of our Ascent into the Gods we imagine. Western civilization was and until recently, was organized to continuously produce Agency at the cost of eugenia, whereas the middle civilizations were organized to limit agency in exchange for dysgenia.

Without Manorialism and Markets (East Asia, Europe) the dysgenia defeats all attempts at preservation of gains. It is not malthus’ numbers that cause dark ages. It is the end of eugenic limitations, let loose by unregulated innovations, that feed regression to the mean, and brought about the Bronze age, Iron Age, and the present Steel Age collapses.

That is why the enlightenment project failed to create either an aristocracy of everyone (British), a middle class of everyone (French and German), or an underclass of everyone (Jewish and Russian). In Europe and east Asia, after more than a thousand years of manorialism, war, disease, and extremely aggressive criminal prosecution, the consequential upward redistribution of reproduction led to distributions that allowed Pareto organization of populations where the ratio of the middle and upper was sufficient to produce surpluses necessary to concentrate capital in multipliers (commons).

But both Hindus (which have yet failed in their project), east Asians (who succeeded under our pressures), and Westerners (who succeeded because of our tradition of empirical law), had an advantage. The Chinese conquered and colonized all border people. The Western Indo Europeans conquered (exterminated) and colonized all border people, and both Europe and east Asia produced homogenous eugenic, agrarian, metalsmithing societies.

Either one is eugenic or dysgenic. The red queen cannot be defeated by any other means. It takes 95 to follow simple instructions, 105 to repair a machine, 115 to learn on one’s own by reading, 120 to design a machine, 130+ to synthesize and communicate ideas, 140+ to invent new ideas. Everyone below that who cannot be put into labor that does not require continuous learning and adaptation.

This is social science. Everything else is religion.


Group Strategy Comparison Chart

............THEM (JEWS) VS US (EUROPE)
......................Feminine vs Masculine
............Female and Semitic vs Male and European
......................One Herd vs Many Packs
......................Equality vs Hierarchy
...............Proportionality vs Reciprocity 
......................Devotion vs Loyalty
......................Quantity vs Quality
...................Consumption vs Capitalization
...........Private Consumption vs Commons Production
...................Undermining vs Order
.....................Authority vs Market 
.....................Dysgenics vs Eugenics
......Stagnation to Devolution vs Innovation to Evolution
........Other's Responsibility vs Personal Responsibility
..The Men Will Take Care of It vs I(We) Must Take Care of It
....................Parasitism vs Productivity
...........Baiting into Hazard vs Offers of Reciprocity 
.................False Promise vs Promise
.........Plausible Deniability vs Warranty 
.............Language (Gossip) vs Action (Engineering) 
.............Face Before Truth vs Truth Before Face
..........Approval/Disapproval vs True/False
................Reasonableness vs Decidability 
............Avoidance by GSRRM vs Truth Regardless of Cost
.................Justification vs Adversarialism
........................Pilpul vs Construction
..Incrementalism via Dialectic vs Decidability vs Argument
......................Critique vs Falsification 
................Incrementalism vs Zero tolerance


The Jewish Century: Marxism-Socialism, Libertarianism, Postmodernism, Feminism, Neo-Conservatism,

The Counter-Revolution Against Anglo Legal-Empiricism, and German Rational-Science.
The Utopian Promise upon Achieving Monopoly Consensus + Straw Man + Pilpul and Critique:

Rousseau (Feminine Subjective) + Schopenhauer, Hegel et al (Conflationists) + Kant (Masculine Analytic)
… -vs-
Marx, Cantor, Freud, Adorno (Working and Underclasses)
… -vs-
Mises, Friedman, Rand, Rothbard, (Middle Classes, Pseudo )
… -vs-
Krugman, Stiglitz, Delong (Commercial – Middle, Pseudoeconomics)
… -vs-
Freud, Boaz, Gould (Priestly – Middle)
… -vs-
Foucault, Derrida, Rorty (Priestly-Feminine Middle)
… -vs-
Friedan, Firestone, Dworkin (Feminists)
… -vs-
Strauss-Neocons (Political/Military-Masculine – Upper)

The gradual attack on Aristocratic (Truthful Reciprocal) Civilization from the bottom up.

Compare To: Judaism > Christianity > Islam.

Same Technique, Same False Promise, Same Catastrophic Consequences


Abrahamism Is the Greatest Cancer Ever Invented by Man

Our common-law tradition and the militia built the West. We escaped the Abrahamic religion and immediately restored our ancient trajectory. The reason for degeneracy is the reintroduction of Abrahamic Religion in pseudoscientific (Marxist) and pseudo-rational (postmodernist) prose.

Sorry. I have spent extraordinary effort in testing our most cherished beliefs: and Abrahamism created the dark ages. Jews did nothing. We did very little. And Muslims destroyed the four great civilizations of the ancient world – dragging them backward into inescapable ignorance.

Every civilization needs literature, oaths, and festivals for the intergenerational propagation of general rules of decidability that express their group competitive strategy. No civilization needs lies, and Abrahamism in word and form is just lies.





Was this page helpful?

Leave a Reply

. . .